Systematic Review on the Definition of Allergic Diseases in Children: The MeDALL Study

Mariona Pinart1, Richard Albang, Dieter Maier

  • 1Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.

Insights

This systematic review found that studies on childhood allergic disease phenotypes are highly varied and often lack objective measures. Standardizing methods and terminology is crucial for better understanding and diagnosis of these conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Respiratory Medicine

Background:

  • Numerous phenotypes and classifications for allergic diseases have been proposed over decades.
  • Significant heterogeneity exists across studies, hindering consistent understanding.
  • No prior systematic review has comprehensively analyzed phenotype classification and diagnostic criteria for allergic diseases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically identify and characterize clinically expressed, population-based phenotypes of allergic diseases in children (0-18 years).
  • To explore the interrelationships between different allergic disease phenotypes.
  • To evaluate the diagnostic measurements and criteria employed in the studies.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE was conducted up to December 2012.
  • Inclusion criteria focused on original English-language studies examining allergic disease phenotypes or diagnostic measures in children.
  • Data extraction and study screening were performed independently by two reviewers.

Main Results:

  • Out of 13,767 citations, 197 studies met the inclusion criteria, predominantly cohort studies (54%).
  • Asthma was the most studied single allergic disease (81.7%). Up to 33 distinct phenotypes were reported, with transient early, late-onset, and persistent wheeze being most common.
  • Questionnaires were the primary data collection tool (78%), while skin-prick tests were the preferred sensitization measure (64%). Objective measures like spirometry were less frequent.

Conclusions:

  • Existing research on pediatric allergic disease phenotypes exhibits substantial heterogeneity.
  • Many studies lack objective phenotypical measures, leading to diagnostic inconsistencies.
  • Standardization of methods and terminology is essential for advancing the field of pediatric allergy research.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos