Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays
Published on: November 12, 2012
Incorporating Genetic Heterogeneity in Whole-Genome Regressions Using Interactions
Gustavo de Los Campos1, Yogasudha Veturi2, Ana I Vazquez3
1Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, 909 Fee Road, Room B601, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA ; Department of Statistics & Probability, Michigan State University, 619 Red Cedar Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Abstract:
Naturally and artificially selected populations usually exhibit some degree of stratification. In Genome-Wide Association Studies and in Whole-Genome Regressions (WGR) analyses, population stratification has been either ignored or dealt with as a potential confounder. However, systematic differences in allele frequency and in patterns of linkage disequilibrium can induce sub-population-specific effects. From this perspective, structure acts as an effect modifier rather than as a confounder. In this article, we extend WGR models commonly used in plant and animal breeding to allow for sub-population-specific effects. This is achieved by decomposing marker effects into main effects and interaction components that describe group-specific deviations. The model can be used both with variable selection and shrinkage methods and can be implemented using existing software for genomic selection. Using a wheat and a pig breeding data set, we compare parameter estimates and the prediction accuracy of the interaction WGR model with WGR analysis ignoring population stratification (across-group analysis) and with a stratified (i.e., within-sub-population) WGR analysis. The interaction model renders trait-specific estimates of the average correlation of effects between sub-populations; we find that such correlation not only depends on the extent of genetic differentiation in allele frequencies between groups but also varies among traits. The evaluation of prediction accuracy shows a modest superiority of the interaction model relative to the other two approaches. This superiority is the result of better stability in performance of the interaction models across data sets and traits; indeed, in almost all cases, the interaction model was either the best performing model or it performed close to the best performing model.
Electronic Supplementary Material:
Supplementary materials for this article are available at 10.1007/s13253-015-0222-5.
More Related Videos
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Multiple Allele Traits
Multiple Allele Traits
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...