Risk and protective factors for falls on stairs in young children: multicentre case-control study

D Kendrick1, K Zou1, J Ablewhite1

  • 1Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.

Insights

Stair gates, carpeted stairs, and mid-stair landings significantly reduce fall injuries in young children. Keeping stairs in good repair also lowers risks, highlighting key safety factors for prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric injury prevention
  • Home safety research
  • Public health

Background:

  • Stair falls are a common cause of injury in children under five.
  • Identifying modifiable risk and protective factors is crucial for effective prevention strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate risk and protective factors associated with stair falls in children under five years old.
  • To inform targeted interventions for reducing pediatric stair fall injuries.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter case-control study was conducted involving children with medically attended stair fall injuries (cases) and matched controls.
  • Data were collected from hospitals, minor injury units, and general practices across four UK study centers.
  • A total of 610 cases and 2658 controls participated in the study.

Main Results:

  • Lack of stair gates (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.50) and open stair gates (AOR 3.09) were significant risk factors.
  • Uncarpeted stairs (AOR 1.52), absence of mid-stair landings (AOR 1.34), and stairs in disrepair (AOR 1.71) also increased injury risk.
  • Parental perception of stairs as unsafe further correlated with increased fall risk.

Conclusions:

  • Structural factors like stair landings and good repair, alongside family factors such as closed stair gates and carpeted stairs, are associated with reduced stair fall risk.
  • Implementing these findings in housing policy and child health promotion could significantly decrease stair fall injuries in young children.
  • Targeting environmental and behavioral factors offers a promising approach to pediatric injury prevention.
Abstract