Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning: A Neuroprotective Technique in Rodents
Published on: June 2, 2015
Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery (Remote IMPACT): a
Michael Walsh1, Richard Whitlock2, Amit X Garg2
1Population Health Research Institute (Walsh, Whitlock, Vincent, Rao-Melacini, Thabane, Devereaux), Hamilton, Ont.; McMaster University (Walsh, Whitlock, Syed, VanHelder, Guyatt, Rao-Melacini, Thabane, Devereaux), Hamilton, Ont.; London Health Sciences Centre (Garg, Lavi), Western University, London, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Légaré), Halifax, NS; Cleveland Clinic (Duncan, Nasr, Sessler), Cleveland, Ohio; Maine Medical Center (Zimmerman, Kramer), Portland, Me.; Wake Forest University (Miller, Gardner), Winston-Salem, NC; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Fremes), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; University of Calgary (Kieser, Ali), Calgary, Alta.; All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Karthikeyan), New Delhi, India; The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Chan, Ho), Hong Kong SAR, China lastwalsh1975@gmail.com.
Background:
Remote ischemic preconditioning is a simple therapy that may reduce cardiac and kidney injury. We undertook a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of this therapy on markers of heart and kidney injury after cardiac surgery.
Methods:
Patients at high risk of death within 30 days after cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to undergo remote ischemic preconditioning or a sham procedure after induction of anesthesia. The preconditioning therapy was three 5-minute cycles of thigh ischemia, with 5 minutes of reperfusion between cycles. The sham procedure was identical except that ischemia was not induced. The primary outcome was peak creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) within 24 hours after surgery (expressed as multiples of the upper limit of normal, with log transformation). The secondary outcome was change in creatinine level within 4 days after surgery (expressed as log-transformed micromoles per litre). Patient-important outcomes were assessed up to 6 months after randomization.
Results:
We randomly assigned 128 patients to remote ischemic preconditioning and 130 to the sham therapy. There were no significant differences in postoperative CK-MB (absolute mean difference 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.07 to 0.36) or creatinine (absolute mean difference 0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.23). Other outcomes did not differ significantly for remote ischemic preconditioning relative to the sham therapy: for myocardial infarction, relative risk (RR) 1.35 (95% CI 0.85 to 2.17); for acute kidney injury, RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.78); for stroke, RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.34 to 3.07); and for death, RR 1.47 (95% CI 0.65 to 3.31).
Interpretation:
Remote ischemic precnditioning did not reduce myocardial or kidney injury during cardiac surgery. This type of therapy is unlikely to substantially improve patient-important outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01071265.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

