Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation01:20

Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation

376
In pharmaceutical development, it's crucial to establish a predictive in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two or more formulations to gain a comprehensive understanding of release properties. IVIVC reduces the need for costly in vivo studies and facilitates the establishment of meaningful dissolution specifications with significant cost savings and decreased regulatory burden. Furthermore, a meaningful IVIVC should predict Cmax and AUC within 20%, aligning with FDA guidance while...
376
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods01:20

Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods

951
Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.
951
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods01:30

Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods

406
Pharmacokinetics is a vital branch of pharmacology that examines how drugs are absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted by the body. Two key methodologies in pharmacokinetics are plasma drug concentration studies and urinary drug excretion analyses, both of which provide critical insights into a drug's therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability.Plasma Drug Concentration-Time StudiesPlasma drug concentration-time studies involve analyzing blood samples at specific intervals to quantify...
406
Methods for Studying Drug Absorption: In vitro01:16

Methods for Studying Drug Absorption: In vitro

755
In vitro experiments are crucial for understanding the transport and absorption of drugs through biological materials. These studies employ varied methods such as the diffusion cell method, the everted sac technique, and the everted ring technique.
The diffusion cell method uses a two-compartment cell, including a donor compartment with the drug solution, which simulates the environment where the drug is applied, and a receptor compartment with a buffer solution, which simulates the environment...
755
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability01:27

Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

551
Bioavailability is a crucial pharmacokinetic parameter that quantifies the proportion of an administered drug that reaches the systemic circulation and is available for therapeutic action. Regulatory agencies mandate the assessment of bioavailability, typically measured as the area under the drug plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), to ensure the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical products. These evaluations are categorized as absolute and relative bioavailability studies.Absolute...
551
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I01:13

In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I

485
Compendial dissolution methods are standardized procedures defined by pharmacopeias to evaluate the rate at which a drug dissolves in a specific medium. These methods ensure batch-to-batch consistency, enable quality control, and support the prediction of drug bioavailability. They are critical for both immediate and modified-release drug products.The apparatuses used for dissolution testing differ in their design and mechanical function, but all aim to simulate the physiological environment of...
485

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The potential of clay- and zeolite-based materials used in agricultural systems: Insights into greenhouse gas emission mitigation.

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Microbial-Plant Synergy Underpins the Mitigation of Atrazine Phytotoxicity in Soybean by a Multifunctional Bacterial Seed Coating.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2026
Same author

PFAS-free alternatives for sustainable applications: Sector-specific solutions and global perspectives.

Chemosphere·2026
Same author

Boosting sulfamethoxazole degradation via peroxymonosulfate activation: Critical comparison of intrinsic and external nitrogen-doped biochar modulated by pore former.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Metal-induced balancing of conjugation and planarity in porphyrin-based monomers to construct the highly crystalline covalent organic frameworks with outstanding visible-light catalytic activity.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2026
Same author

Biotechnologies for removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in biosolids: Current status and challenges.

Journal of environmental management·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

7.4K

Quantifying statistical relationships between commonly used in vitro models for estimating lead bioaccessibility.

Kaihong Yan1,2, Zhaomin Dong1,2, Yanju Liu1,2

  • 1Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Mawson Lakes, SA, 5095, Australia.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
|December 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Lead (Pb) bioaccessibility in contaminated soils varies significantly across five common in vitro methods. Statistical analysis revealed comparable results between Relative Bioavailability Leaching Procedure (RBALP) and other methods, aiding standardization efforts.

Keywords:
BioaccessibilityCorrelationsIn vitro modelsLead

More Related Videos

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.8K
The Caco-2 Cell Bioassay for Measurement of Food Iron Bioavailability
06:34

The Caco-2 Cell Bioassay for Measurement of Food Iron Bioavailability

Published on: April 28, 2022

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

7.4K
In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.8K
The Caco-2 Cell Bioassay for Measurement of Food Iron Bioavailability
06:34

The Caco-2 Cell Bioassay for Measurement of Food Iron Bioavailability

Published on: April 28, 2022

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Soil Science

Background:

  • Estimating lead (Pb) bioaccessibility in contaminated soils is crucial for risk assessment.
  • Existing in vitro methods for Pb bioaccessibility assessment yield variable results.
  • Method variability is influenced by extractant composition and soil characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically quantify the relationships between five commonly used in vitro methods for Pb bioaccessibility.
  • To compare Pb bioaccessibility results across different in vitro models using diverse contaminated soils.
  • To provide a scientific basis for standardizing in vitro bioaccessibility measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Ten long-term Pb-contaminated soils from Western and South Australia were analyzed.
  • Five in vitro methods were employed: Relative Bioavailability Leaching Procedure (RBALP), unified BioAccessibility Research Group Europe (BARGE) method (UBM), Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium assay (SBRC), Physiologically Based Extraction Test (PBET), and in vitro Digestion Model (RIVM).
  • Statistical regression analyses were performed to compare method outputs.

Main Results:

  • Pb bioaccessibility varied from 1.9–106% (gastric phase) and 0.2–78.6% (intestinal phase) across all methods and soils.
  • Regression analysis indicated comparable Pb bioaccessibility between RBALP and SBRC, and RBALP and RIVM (0.06g soil).
  • Slopes between RBALP and UBM (1.21), and RBALP and RIVM (0.6g soil) (1.02) suggest varying degrees of agreement.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variations in Pb bioaccessibility underscore the importance of method selection.
  • The chosen in vitro method for bioaccessibility assessment requires validation against in vivo studies for accurate risk prediction.
  • Findings support the standardization of in vitro bioaccessibility measurements and provide a basis for relating Pb bioavailability to soil properties.