Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

06:32
Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
Published on: December 5, 2025
888
A single- versus double-layered closure technique for full-thickness lower eyelid defects: a comparative study
Jennifer S N Verhoekx1, Renoe K Soebhag1, Olga Weijtens1
1The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Acta Ophthalmologica
|December 17, 2015
Summary
Simplified single-layer closure and double-layer closure are equally safe and effective for lower eyelid reconstruction after full-thickness excision. Both techniques rarely require eyelid margin adjustment sutures.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Plastic Surgery
Background:
- Lower eyelid reconstruction is crucial after tumor excision.
- Standard techniques often involve multiple layers of closure.
- Evaluating simplified closure methods can improve surgical efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare single-layer versus double-layer closure for lower eyelid defects.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of a simplified closure technique.
- To evaluate complication rates in lower eyelid reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study of 188 eyelids (2011-2014).
- Group A: single-layer closure with non-absorbable sutures.
- Group B: double-layer closure with absorbable sutures.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in notching between groups (p = 0.96).
- No wound dehiscence occurred in either group.
- Slightly higher, though not statistically significant, rates of subcutaneous granuloma and mild redness in the double-layer group.
Conclusions:
- Both single- and double-layered techniques are safe and effective.
- Simplified single-layer closure offers a viable alternative.
- Eyelid margin adjustment sutures are rarely needed with either method.
Keywords:
double-layered techniquefull-thickness eyelid-margin defectsgrey line suturepentagonal block excisionsingle-layered technique
