Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

1.0K
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

999
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
999
Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity01:12

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity

1.4K
Consider a coffee mug hanging on a hook in a pantry. If the mug gets knocked, it oscillates back and forth like a pendulum until the oscillations die out.
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Not Just Bad Periods': Survey of Aotearoa New Zealand Endometriosis Patients on Their Perspectives on the Impact of Endometriosis Awareness.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same author

Nursing care for patients with endometriosis in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey study.

Journal of research in nursing : JRN·2026
Same author

Commercial cannabis product testing: Fidelity to labels and regulations.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Endometriosis and the Hallmarks of Cancer.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2025
Same author

Evidence of spontaneous mentalizing in children with Cornelia de Lange and fragile X syndromes, but not autistic children.

Oxford open neuroscience·2025
Same author

Pupillary dynamics as a marker of acute cannabis inhalation.

Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

13.2K

Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.

Katherine Ellis1, Jacqueline Kerr, Suneeta Godbole

  • 11Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA; 2Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA; and 3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
|December 18, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning algorithms accurately classify physical activity (PA) types using hip or wrist accelerometers. Wrist devices offer better compliance, despite slightly lower accuracy than hip-worn devices for PA measurement.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.4K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

13.2K
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.4K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Kinesiology
  • Wearable Technology

Background:

  • Accelerometers are key for objective physical activity (PA) measurement.
  • Wrist-worn accelerometers may improve participant adherence compared to hip-worn devices.
  • Current methods for analyzing accelerometer data in free-living settings require further validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) algorithms for classifying PA types.
  • To compare the performance of ML algorithms using hip and wrist accelerometer data.
  • To assess the validity of ML algorithms against traditional cut-point methods.

Main Methods:

  • Forty overweight/obese women wore hip and wrist accelerometers for seven days.
  • Wearable cameras provided ground truth activity data.
  • A random forest and hidden Markov model classifier was used to categorize activities (sitting, standing, walking/running, vehicle).

Main Results:

  • The ML classifier achieved 89.4% (hip) and 84.6% (wrist) balanced accuracy for PA classification.
  • ML algorithms accurately estimated daily walking/running time.
  • Traditional cut-point methods and laboratory algorithms underestimated walking duration.

Conclusions:

  • ML algorithms demonstrate superior performance for PA classification compared to traditional methods.
  • While hip-based ML algorithms showed higher accuracy, wrist-based devices may be preferable due to improved participant compliance.
  • The developed ML approach offers a promising tool for objective PA assessment in free-living conditions.