Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Culprit vessel versus immediate complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction-a
Frederick A Spencer1, Nigar Sekercioglu2, Manya Prasad3
1Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Insights
Performing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease reduces repeat revascularization and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). This approach offers significant benefits without increasing mortality risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials & Meta-Analysis
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel coronary artery disease.
- Emerging randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest potential benefits of performing PCI on non-culprit lesions concurrently.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze RCTs comparing multivessel PCI versus culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients.
- To evaluate the impact of multivessel PCI on key clinical outcomes including recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and mortality.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of complete case data from eligible RCTs.
- Data were sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL) up to August 2015.
- Random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for primary outcomes.
Main Results:
- Five RCTs comprising 1,606 patients were included, with 1,568 having complete data.
- Multivessel PCI significantly reduced the risk of repeat revascularization (RR 0.36) and recurrent nonfatal MI (RR 0.58) over 2 years.
- No significant increase in mortality (RR 0.82) or other adverse events was observed.
Conclusions:
- Pooled data indicate moderate-certainty evidence for appreciable reduction in nonfatal MI with multivessel PCI.
- High-certainty evidence supports a significant reduction in the need for repeat revascularization.
- These benefits are likely to be highly valued by patients undergoing treatment for STEMI with multivessel disease.
Background:
Guidelines suggest percutaneous intervention (PCI) of only the culprit artery in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest benefit to performing PCI of other stenotic vessels at the same time as culprit vessel PCI.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review with complete case meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL from 1946 to March 2014; MEDLINE and EMBASE from March 2014 to March 2015; and scanning of literature for new studies until August 2015. All RCTs comparing multivessel versus culprit-only PCI in patients with STEMI were eligible. The primary outcomes of interest were recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), recurrent revascularization, and mortality. We combined data from trials to estimate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and associated 95% CIs using random-effects models.
Results:
Five RCTs including 1,606 patients of whom 1,568 had complete data proved eligible. Multivessel revascularization was associated with decreased risk of repeat revascularization (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27-0.49, risk difference 9.7% over 2 years) and recurrent nonfatal MI (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93, risk difference 1.8% over 2 years), without increase in mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.53-1.26) or other adverse events.
Conclusions:
Pooled data provide moderate-certainty evidence that performance of multivessel PCI will provide an appreciable reduction in nonfatal MI and high-certainty evidence that it will reduce need for repeat revascularization. Patients are likely to place a high value on these benefits.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care