Preoperative risk assessment in children undergoing major urologic surgery
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Daryl J McLeod1, Lindsey Asti2, Justin B Mahida2
1Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Section of Urology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Insights
Preoperative risk assessment in pediatric urology differs significantly based on surgical complexity. Bowel-involved surgeries have worse outcomes, while specific factors predict complications in pure genitourinary procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Urologic Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Pediatric preoperative risk assessment differs from adult standards.
- Existing risk models are often inapplicable to children.
- Surgical procedure type significantly impacts pediatric outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate preoperative risk factors for various outcomes in children undergoing major urologic surgery.
- Utilize the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database.
- Identify predictors of adverse events in pediatric urologic surgery.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed a cohort of 2-18-year-old children from the 2012-2013 NSQIP-Pediatric database.
- Included major urologic surgeries involving peritoneal or extraperitoneal space dissection.
- Separated patients into pure genitourinary and bowel-involved groups for analysis.
- Employed multivariable logistic regression to evaluate postoperative outcomes.
Main Results:
- 2601 patients were identified; 15.3% had bowel involvement.
- Bowel-involved surgery patients were older, had more comorbidities, and worse outcomes.
- In pure genitourinary surgery, older age and white race improved outcomes.
- ASA class ≥ 3, obesity, and preoperative renal disease predicted negative outcomes in the pure genitourinary group.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences exist in outcomes between bowel-involved and pure genitourinary pediatric urologic surgery.
- Identified specific preoperative risk factors for adverse outcomes in pure genitourinary surgery.
- NSQIP-Pediatric data enables novel identification of risk factors for improved surgical planning and care.
Background:
Preoperative risk assessment is standard in adult surgery, but often these risk assessments cannot be applied to children. Previous studies emphasize the differences between pediatric and adult populations and variability by surgical procedure types.
Objective:
We investigated preoperative risk factors for several outcomes in children undergoing major urologic surgery using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric.
Study Design:
A cohort of 2-18-year-old children who underwent major urologic surgery was identified by Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes in the 2012-2013 NSQIP-Pediatric. The NSQIP-Pediatric prospectively collects standardized and validated data from 61 sites on preoperative, operative, and 30-day postoperative variables. Urologic surgeries involving dissection of the peritoneal or extraperitoneal space were included. Patients undergoing pure genitourinary surgery were analyzed separately from those with bowel involvement to improve homogeneity. Postoperative outcomes including hospital length of stay and 30-day infective complications, non-infective complications, unplanned reoperation and readmissions were evaluated by fitting multivariable logistic regression models.
Results:
A total of 2601 patients were identified, of whom 399 (15.3%) underwent bowel-involved surgery and 2202 (84.7%) underwent pure genitourinary surgery. Patients in the bowel-involved group were significantly older with more comorbidity. Postoperative complications, unplanned return to operating room, hospital length of stay and readmission rates were all significantly worse in the bowel-involved group. In the pure genitourinary group, older age and white race improved some outcomes, while American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) class ≥ 3, total operation time, obesity, pulmonary risk factors, preoperative renal disease, developmental delay, structural central nervous system abnormality, and supplemental nutrition independently predicted at least one negative outcome (Table).
Discussion:
Consistent with previous research on reconstructive surgery, we identified a significant difference in patient age, surgery details, comorbidity, and increased complications for patients undergoing urologic surgery with bowel involvement compared with pure genitourinary surgery. Focusing solely on pure genitourinary surgery, we identified predictors of outcomes. Identification of these factors in pediatric urology is novel and only recently possible with the availability of the NSQIP-Pediatric.
Conclusion:
Using the NSQIP-Pediatric, we confirmed differences in complication rates for major urologic surgeries, with and without bowel involvement in a national sample. Preoperative risk characteristics were also identified for patients undergoing pure genitourinary surgery. Further investigation into these relationships is necessary to better elucidate their clinical significance with the goal of improving surgical planning, postoperative care, and family counseling.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System I: Health History
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management

