Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Saline/Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy Device As an Adjunct for Hemostasis in Solid Organ Injury/Trauma
Published on: July 28, 2020
The use of an institutional pediatric abdominal trauma protocol improves resource use
Sara C Fallon1, David Delemos, Adesola Akinkuotu
1From the Division of Pediatric Surgery (S.C.F, A.A., B.J.N.-M.), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, and Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (D.D., D.C.), Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine; and Trauma Services (D.D., D.C., B.J.N.-M.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Insights
A new protocol for pediatric abdominal trauma management reduced unnecessary CT scans and laboratory costs. This improved patient safety and resource utilization in the emergency center.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
- Health Services Research
Background:
- A novel protocol was developed to standardize emergency center (EC) management of abdominal trauma in children.
- The protocol aimed to improve patient safety by reducing computed tomography (CT) radiation exposure.
- The study also sought to enhance care quality by decreasing EC length of stay (LOS) and laboratory costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized EC protocol for pediatric abdominal trauma.
- To determine if the protocol decreased unnecessary CT scans and associated radiation.
- To assess the protocol's impact on EC LOS and laboratory expenses.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted on pediatric patients with abdominal trauma requiring CT scans.
- Patients were analyzed across three periods: preimplementation, Postimplementation 1, and Postimplementation 2.
- Outcome measures included protocol adherence, CT results, EC LOS, and laboratory costs, analyzed using chi-squared and ANOVA tests.
Main Results:
- Protocol adherence improved over time, reaching 82% in Postimplementation 2.
- The rate of positive CT scan results significantly increased from 23% to 46% (p=0.003).
- Clinically significant scans were more frequent when the protocol was followed (31% vs. 8%, p=0.001), while EC LOS remained unchanged. Laboratory costs decreased significantly in Postimplementation 2 (p=0.005).
Conclusions:
- An institutional abdominal trauma management algorithm effectively improves resource utilization.
- The protocol successfully reduced unnecessary computed tomography (CT) scan use.
- The implemented algorithm also led to a decrease in laboratory costs for pediatric abdominal trauma patients.
Background:
A novel protocol to standardize the emergency center (EC) management of abdominal trauma in children was developed and implemented at our trauma center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether this protocol improved patient safety by decreasing unnecessary computed tomography (CT) radiation and improved quality of care by decreasing EC length of stay (LOS) and laboratory costs.
Methods:
We performed a prospective, longitudinal study of children who presented to the EC with a mechanism for abdominal trauma and received an abdominal CT scan from January 2011 to September 2014. Patients were divided into protocol periods: preimplementation (January 2011 to December 2011), Postimplementation 1 (January 2012 to August 2013), and Postimplementation 2 (September 2013 to September 2014). Outcome measures included protocol adherence, rates of clinically positive CT results, the EC LOS, and the cost of laboratory studies. χ and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.
Results:
During the study period, 117 patients in the preimplementation, 148 patients in the Postimplementation 1, and 56 patients in the Postimplementation 2 periods were identified. Protocol adherence improved from 70% to 82% (p = 0.11) from the Postimplementation 1 to Postimplementation 2 periods. The rate of positive CT scan results increased from 23% to 31% to 46% (p = 0.003) from preimplementation to Postimplementation 1 and Postimplementation 2, respectively. When the protocol was followed, the proportion of clinically significant scans was higher than when it was not followed (31% vs. 8%, p = 0.001). The EC LOS was unchanged (median [range], 271 minutes [16-1,039 minutes] vs. 233 minutes [40-1,396 minutes], p = 0.34). The median cost of laboratory studies remained the same from preimplementation to Postimplementation 1 ($166 [$0-$454] vs. $352 [$0-$448], p = 0.29) and decreased after the second protocol revision included an emphasis on laboratory work in Postimplementation 2 ($139 [$33-$426], p = 0.005).
Conclusion:
The use of an institutional abdominal trauma management algorithm is an effective method of improving resource use by decreasing unnecessary CT scan use and laboratory costs.
Level Of Evidence:
Economic analysis, level IV; therapeutic/care management study, level IV.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction

