Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

952
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
952
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

1.3K
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
1.3K
Language Development01:22

Language Development

1.0K
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
1.0K
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

918
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
918
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

4.1K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-Registration of EEG and Eye-Tracking in Psycholinguistics and Bilingualism Research.

Frontiers in language sciences·2026
Same author

Biological sex and bilingualism: Its impact on risk and resilience for dementia.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Cognitive reserve is associated with less cognitive decline from white matter hyperintensities.

Neurobiology of aging·2025
Same author

Natural Speech Analysis Can Reveal Individual Differences in Executive Function Across the Adult Lifespan.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Cognitive Reserve Disrupts Cognitive Decline from White Matter Hyperintensities.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Language experience influences performance on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: A cluster analysis.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2025
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.8K

Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners.

Deanna C Friesen1, Ashley Chung-Fat-Yim1, Ellen Bialystok1

  • 1York University, Department of Psychology, Toronto, Canada.

Brain and Language
|December 20, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bilinguals and monolinguals process words differently, with bilinguals experiencing more conflict during language processing due to interference from their second language. This impacts how they integrate related words during listening tasks.

Keywords:
BilingualismConflict resolutionEvent-related potentialsLexical selection

More Related Videos

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.8K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

970

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.8K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.8K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

970

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Language Acquisition

Background:

  • Understanding language competition is crucial for comprehending speech processing.
  • Bilingualism presents unique challenges and adaptations in language processing compared to monolingualism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how monolinguals and bilinguals resolve within-language competition when listening to isolated words.
  • To examine the neural correlates (event-related potentials) of semantic and phonological interference in bilingual and monolingual listeners.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to record brain activity.
  • Participants listened to a word while viewing two pictures (semantically-related, phonologically-related, or unrelated).
  • Presentation timing varied between simultaneous and sequential onsets of pictures and words.

Main Results:

  • Simultaneous presentation led to interference for both groups, with monolinguals showing reduced N400s to semantic pairs, unlike bilinguals.
  • Sequential presentation revealed different patterns, with both groups showing N400 modulation by semantic and phonological relationships.
  • Bilinguals exhibited less integration of related items in simultaneous tasks, suggesting cross-linguistic interference.

Conclusions:

  • Bilinguals experience greater conflict during lexical selection compared to monolinguals, particularly in simultaneous language processing.
  • The findings highlight differences in the cognitive control mechanisms employed by bilinguals and monolinguals during auditory word recognition.
  • Language experience significantly shapes the neural dynamics of resolving competition in the speech comprehension system.