Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.9K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.9K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.8K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.0K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chemoradiotherapy and transanal endoscopic surgery versus transanal endoscopic surgery alone in T1N0M0 rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase III clinical trial (TAUTEM-T1 study).

International journal of colorectal disease·2026
Same author

X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy for rapid identification of cathode chemistry in lithium-ion battery recycling.

Communications engineering·2026
Same author

Focus on the Raman 2D band of the graphene materials: bibliographic review and guiding tools for determining number of layers and stacking configurations.

Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)·2026
Same author

Complex hiatus hernias. Diagnostic and therapeutic management recommendations.

Cirugia espanola·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Surgery With Curative Intent: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same author

Unlocking Superior Photodetection Properties of Electrodeposited MoS<sub>2</sub> Quantum Dots.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Preventable deaths and potentially preventable deaths. What are our errors?

Sandra Montmany1, Anna Pallisera2, Pere Rebasa3

  • 1General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, C. Sant Llorenç, 14-1r1a, 08202 Sabadell, Spain.

Injury
|December 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Standardizing trauma care error classification is crucial. A universal language, like the Joint Commission taxonomy, helps identify and reduce preventable deaths in trauma patients, improving overall care quality.

Keywords:
ErrorsJoint CommissionPreventable deathsTrauma patients

More Related Videos

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Trauma care systems
  • Patient safety

Background:

  • Lack of standardized systems for identifying and addressing errors in multiple trauma patient management.
  • Need for a universal language to classify patient safety incidents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Detect preventable and potentially preventable deaths in trauma patients.
  • Classify all management errors using a standardized, universal language.

Main Methods:

  • Studied trauma patients over 16 admitted to critical care or who died.
  • Multidisciplinary sessions to determine preventability of deaths.
  • Classified management errors using the Joint Commission taxonomy and ATLS protocols.

Main Results:

  • 19 of 115 trauma deaths were preventable or potentially preventable.
  • 130 errors recorded in total deaths; 46 in preventable/potentially preventable deaths.
  • Main errors included delayed treatment and CT scans in unstable patients; human failure ('rule-based' errors) was the primary cause.

Conclusions:

  • Measuring and recording results is key to improving trauma patient care quality.
  • A common language, such as the Joint Commission taxonomy, standardizes patient safety data.
  • Standardization improves incident recording, analysis, and treatment for better patient outcomes.