Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
Published on: May 8, 2021
An analytical comparison between point-of-care uric acid testing meters
Jonathan Paraskos1, Zsofia Berke2, Jason Cook2
1a Research & Development , AstraZeneca , Macclesfield , UK.
Objective:
A key goal in gout treatment is achieving sustained serum uric acid (sUA) lowering. Point-of-care test (PoCT) meters provide convenient, rapid measures of sUA levels to monitor/adjust therapy. Four commercially available sUA PoCT meters were compared qualitatively (ease of use) and quantitatively (precision/accuracy).
Methods:
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis was used as a laboratory reference method to compare precision of PoCT devices using blood samples from 20 healthy volunteers. Accuracy was compared against the LC-MS reference method and a laboratory clinical chemistry platform.
Results:
Qualitatively, EasyTouch(®) GU and UASure were least user-friendly, requiring repeated attempts for accurate use. HumaSens and BeneCheck provided good usability and assay precision. Cross-validation of meter precision with laboratory-based uricase assay gave good correlations between both methods (R(2) = 0.8061 and 0.7605, respectively).
Conclusion:
UA PoCT meters can be important in managing gout, and the characteristics compared herein may enhance successful patient uptake.
More Related Videos
05:58Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
10:02Quantitative SERS Detection of Uric Acid via Formation of Precise Plasmonic Nanojunctions within Aggregates of Gold Nanoparticles and Cucurbit[n]uril
Published on: October 3, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis