Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

8.1K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
8.1K
Morphogenesis02:19

Morphogenesis

30.8K
Plant morphogenesis—the development of a plant’s form and structure—involves several overlapping developmental processes, including growth and cell differentiation. Precursor cells differentiate into specific cell types, which are organized into the tissues and organ systems that make up the functional plant.
30.8K
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes02:45

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

10.1K
In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.  
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female...
10.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

24.5K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.5K
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

7.3K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
7.3K
Dosage Compensation02:50

Dosage Compensation

7.8K
In animals, gender is determined by the number and type of sex chromosome. For example, human females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y chromosome, whereas C.elegans with one X chromosome is a male, and the one with two X chromosomes is a hermaphrodite.
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with  distinct numbers of X chromosomes will...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New annotations for three pea aphid genome assemblies allow comparative analyses of duplication and gene family evolution.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

A chromatin accessibility map of pea aphid brain and embryo identifies tissue-specific regulatory elements.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Stochastic Pacemaker: Cumulative Behavioral Noise Drives Morphological Plasticity in Pea Aphids.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Relevance and Resilience of Evo-Devo in 2025: The Biennial Meeting of the Pan American Society for Evolutionary Developmental Biology.

Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution·2026
Same author

Aphid wing plasticity: hormonal and epigenetic control mechanisms.

Current opinion in insect science·2026
Same author

Long-term effects of the early life environment on alternative splicing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Imaging and Analysis of Tissue Orientation and Growth Dynamics in the Developing Drosophila Epithelia During Pupal Stages
08:25

Imaging and Analysis of Tissue Orientation and Growth Dynamics in the Developing Drosophila Epithelia During Pupal Stages

Published on: June 2, 2020

10.1K

The right tools for the job: Regulating polyphenic morph development in insects.

Jennifer A Brisson1, Gregory K Davis2

  • 1Department of Biology, Box 270211, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, United States.

Current Opinion in Insect Science
|December 23, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Polyphenism, where organisms develop distinct forms based on environmental cues, is key to adaptation. Understanding its evolution requires studying the proximate factors regulating these alternative phenotypes (morphs).

More Related Videos

Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster
12:10

Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: April 14, 2017

11.0K
Quantifying Abdominal Pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster
08:41

Quantifying Abdominal Pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: June 1, 2017

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Imaging and Analysis of Tissue Orientation and Growth Dynamics in the Developing Drosophila Epithelia During Pupal Stages
08:25

Imaging and Analysis of Tissue Orientation and Growth Dynamics in the Developing Drosophila Epithelia During Pupal Stages

Published on: June 2, 2020

10.1K
Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster
12:10

Protocols for Visualizing Steroidogenic Organs and Their Interactive Organs with Immunostaining in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: April 14, 2017

11.0K
Quantifying Abdominal Pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster
08:41

Quantifying Abdominal Pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: June 1, 2017

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Developmental biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Polyphenism involves adaptive developmental plasticity, producing discrete alternative phenotypes (morphs) in response to environmental cues.
  • This phenomenon is crucial for adaptation and generates variation for natural selection.
  • Understanding the evolution of polyphenism hinges on identifying the proximate factors controlling alternative morph production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current research on the proximate factors regulating polyphenism.
  • To highlight the necessity of integrating diverse methodologies for a comprehensive understanding.
  • To provide insights into the complex mechanisms underlying alternative morphology development.

Main Methods:

  • Review of hormone manipulation studies.
  • Analysis of targeted transcriptomic studies.
  • Examination of epigenetic profiling research.

Main Results:

  • Multiple approaches, including hormone manipulation, transcriptomics, and epigenetics, are being used to study polyphenism.
  • These methods offer insights into the regulatory mechanisms of alternative morph production.
  • No single method is sufficient; integration is key.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the evolution of polyphenism requires elucidating the proximate regulatory factors.
  • Multilayered approaches integrating hormone, gene expression, and epigenetic data are essential.
  • Further research integrating these diverse data types will unravel the complex mechanisms of polyphenism.