Intra-cardiac echocardiography in alcohol septal ablation: a prospective comparative study against trans-thoracic

Robert M Cooper1, Adeel Shahzad1, James Newton2

  • 1Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital , Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE , UK.

Echo Research and Practice
|December 23, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is not effective for guiding alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy due to poor visualization of myocardial contrast. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains superior for this procedure.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) treats hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy by reducing left ventricular outflow tract gradients.
  • A significant portion of patients do not respond to ASA, potentially due to inaccurate infarct localization.
  • Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can be challenging in the laboratory setting for visualizing myocardial contrast during ASA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) versus TTE in assessing key anatomical structures and myocardial contrast during ASA.
  • To evaluate the performance of ICE and TTE in visualizing mitral valve anatomy, target septum, and adjacent structures.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 20 consecutive patients undergoing ASA.
  • Paired TTE and ICE images were independently reviewed by two experts to assess specific anatomical domains.
  • The ability to visualize myocardial contrast following septal arterial injection was assessed by the performing cardiologist.

Main Results:

  • ICE demonstrated superiority in visualizing mitral valve anatomy (P=0.02).
  • TTE was superior in assessing adjacent structures (P=0.002).
  • ICE poorly visualized myocardial contrast in 17/19 patients due to acoustic shadowing and inadequate opacification, limiting its use in guiding ASA.

Conclusions:

  • ICE is not suitable for guiding ASA due to its inability to clearly visualize myocardial contrast.
  • TTE is substantially better for visualizing myocardial contrast during ASA.
  • While ICE has limitations for contrast visualization, both ICE and TTE showed no significant difference in assessing overall cardiac anatomy relevant to ASA.