Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor-recipient age difference

Patrick H Gibson1, Fernando Riesgo2, Jonathan B Choy2

  • 1Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh , 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA , UK.

Echo Research and Practice
|December 23, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Donor age impacts cardiac transplant patients' ability to reach target heart rate during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Older donors were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving adequate stress levels, affecting diagnostic accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is crucial for diagnosing allograft vasculopathy post-cardiac transplant.
  • Achieving target heart rate (HR) during DSE is essential for accurate assessment.
  • The influence of donor-recipient age difference on DSE outcomes is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of donor-recipient age difference on achieving target HR during DSE.
  • To determine if donor age influences dobutamine dosage requirements and HR achievement.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 61 cardiac transplant patients undergoing DSE over 3 years.
  • Target HR defined as 85% of maximum predicted HR (220 - patient age).
  • Analysis of patient/donor demographics, dobutamine dosage, and HR achieved.

Main Results:

  • Only 61% of patients achieved their target HR.
  • Patients with older donors required higher dobutamine doses (median 50 vs 30 mcg/kg/min).
  • Older donors were associated with lower percentage target HR achieved (93% vs 101%) and a significantly lower likelihood of achieving target HR (18% vs 67%).

Conclusions:

  • Donor-recipient age difference is a significant factor affecting the ability to achieve target HR during DSE.
  • Consideration of donor age may be necessary when interpreting DSE results in patients unable to reach adequate stress levels.
  • This finding has implications for the diagnostic utility of DSE in cardiac transplant follow-up.