Cardiovascular medicine heart failure (CVM-HF) index as prognostic model for candidates to MitraClip therapy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Gian Paolo Ussia1, Valeria Cammalleri2, Ersilia Mazzotta2
1Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy. gpussia@hotmail.com.
Insights
Transcatheter MitraClip repair outcomes were assessed in severe mitral regurgitation patients using the cardiovascular medicine heart failure (CVM-HF) index. High-risk patients showed poorer survival and higher re-hospitalization rates compared to medium-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) poses a significant challenge, particularly in patients unsuitable for conventional surgery.
- Transcatheter MitraClip repair offers a less invasive option for high-risk MR patients.
- Risk stratification is crucial for optimizing patient selection for MitraClip therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate one-year clinical outcomes of MitraClip procedures stratified by the cardiovascular medicine heart failure (CVM-HF) index.
- To compare outcomes between medium-risk (Group B) and high-risk (Group C) patients undergoing MitraClip repair.
- To assess the utility of the CVM-HF index in predicting MitraClip therapy benefits in advanced heart failure patients with functional MR.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 46 consecutive patients undergoing MitraClip repair were divided into three groups based on the CVM-HF index (low, medium, high risk).
- One-year follow-up data was collected for primary and secondary endpoints.
- Statistical comparison of outcomes between Group B (medium-risk) and Group C (high-risk) was performed using the log-rank test.
Main Results:
- High-risk patients (Group C) demonstrated significantly poorer outcomes compared to medium-risk patients (Group B).
- 12-month survival free from composite events was 44.4% in Group C vs. 74.1% in Group B (p=0.039).
- 12-month survival free from re-hospitalization was 39.9% in Group C vs. 74.1% in Group B (p=0.036).
- Cardiac mortality was higher in Group C (16.7%) compared to Group B (0%) (p=0.027).
Conclusions:
- The CVM-HF index is valuable in identifying patients with advanced heart failure and functional MR who may benefit from MitraClip therapy.
- High-risk patients, as defined by the CVM-HF index, experience significantly worse one-year outcomes after MitraClip repair.
- Risk stratification using the CVM-HF index can aid in patient selection for transcatheter mitral valve repair.
Abstract:
Transcatheter MitraClip repair is a new tool for the management of severe mitral regurgitation in patients at very high risk for conventional surgery. Aim of our study was reporting one-year clinical outcomes in candidates to MitraClip procedures, divided into three groups according to the cardiovascular medicine heart failure (CVM-HF) index. The study population consists of 46 consecutive patients, divided, in accordance with CVM-HF index, as follows: one patient in the low-risk category (group A); 27 patients in the medium-risk (group B) and 18 patients in high-risk category (group C). The primary study endpoint was a combined of all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization rate. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Patients of group B and group C were compared. Regarding the primary endpoint, patients in group C had significantly poorer outcomes than patients in group B, with a 12-month survival freedom from events of 44.4 and 74.1 %, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.039); survival freedom from cardiac mortality was 100 and 83.3 % in group B and C, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.027). One-year survival free from re-hospitalization was 74.1 % in group B and 39.9 % in group C (log-rank test; p = 0.036). Survival free from all-cause of mortality was 92.6 and 77.8 %, respectively (log-rank test; p = 0.129). In our initial experience the CVM-HF index showed to be valuable for understanding if the patient with advanced heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation can really benefit by MitraClip therapy.
More Related Videos
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management