Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction - Present status
1Department of Cardiology, Mittal Hospital & Research Centre, Pushkar Road, Ajmer 305001, Rajasthan, India.
Insights
Diagnosing microvascular angina is challenging due to limitations in noninvasive tests. Definitive diagnosis currently relies on invasive coronary evaluations, especially for persistent symptoms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Microvascular angina diagnosis is difficult with current knowledge.
- Standard noninvasive tests like ECG and echocardiography often yield normal or unremarkable results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the diagnostic challenges of microvascular angina.
- To outline current definitive diagnostic criteria and invasive evaluation recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing diagnostic modalities for microvascular angina.
- Description of invasive diagnostic criteria including coronary flow reserve and spasm provocation.
Main Results:
- Noninvasive methods like echocardiography and radio-isotope imaging have limited diagnostic accuracy for microvascular angina.
- Definitive diagnosis requires invasive assessment: normal epicardial coronaries, coronary flow reserve < 2.5, and absence of epicardial spasm.
Conclusions:
- A high index of suspicion is crucial for noninvasive diagnosis.
- Invasive evaluation is reserved for patients with intractable symptoms and unconfirmed diagnosis despite empirical therapy.
- Further evaluation of therapeutic and prognostic implications of diagnostic parameters is needed.
Abstract:
Definite clinical diagnosis of microvascular angina is not possible with the existing knowledge. Resting electrocardiogram may be normal, and exercise electrocardiogram may be unremarkable. Echocardiography usually does not show regional wall motion abnormalities. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography can satisfactorily evaluate only left anterior descending coronary artery and that too in some patients. Radio-isotope imaging can detect only severe localized disease. Noninvasive diagnosis needs high index of suspicion. At present, definite diagnosis is based on documentation of normal epicardial coronaries, coronary flow reserve less than 2.5 on adenosine induced hyperemia, and absence of spasm of epicardial coronaries on acetylcholine provocation. Invasive evaluation is costly, needs sophisticated equipments and expertise. Therapeutic and prognostic implications of various parameters remains to be evaluated. At present invasive evaluation is recommended only for patients with intractable symptoms with unconfirmed diagnosis, requiring repeated hospitalization and evaluation with failure of empirical therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations

