Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography
Published on: June 21, 2024
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of acute renal infarction
Toru Miyoshi1, Hideki Okayama2, Go Hiasa2
1Department of Cardiology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasugamachi 83, Matsuyama, Ehime, 790-0024, Japan. mmyrb0807@gmail.com.
Insights
A patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy experienced back pain after an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound revealed left kidney infarction, a complication of the device shock.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- A 65-year-old male with dilated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation presented after ventricular fibrillation and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock.
- The patient developed acute kidney injury with suspected renal infarction, complicated by chronic renal failure and the presence of an ICD, precluding standard imaging.
Observation:
- Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were contraindicated due to the patient's chronic renal failure and ICD.
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) was utilized to assess acute kidney injury and suspected renal infarction.
Findings:
- CEUS demonstrated a wedge-shaped, non-enhancing area in the left kidney.
- This finding is indicative of renal infarction, a potential complication following an ICD shock.
Implications:
- CEUS serves as a valuable tool for diagnosing renal infarction in patients with contraindications to CT and MRI.
- This case highlights a rare complication of ICD therapy and underscores the utility of advanced ultrasound techniques in challenging clinical scenarios.
Abstract:
A 65-year-old male in the dilated phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and with persistent atrial fibrillation was admitted to our hospital because of an episode of ventricular fibrillation following an appropriate shock from an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). At admission, electrocardiography showed a normal sinus rhythm. He had complained of back pain 7 days after the ICD shock. Renal infarction was suspected, although computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed because of chronic renal failure and the presence of his ICD. We, therefore, used contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with a contrast agent to evaluate his acute kidney injury. This showed the left kidney contained a wedge-shaped area that was not enhanced by the contrast agent, indicating an area of infarction.
More Related Videos
09:02A Large Animal Model for Acute Kidney Injury by Temporary Bilateral Renal Artery Occlusion
Published on: February 2, 2021
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies