Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Scale Structure of the Patient Care Monitor Version 2.0
Gregory P Samsa1, Steven Wolf1, Thomas W LeBlanc2
1Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Context:
The Patient Care Monitor (PCM), version 2.0, is an electronic patient-reported outcomes instrument designed to be embedded into oncology practices. One key psychometric component of an instrument is its factor structure.
Objectives:
To validate the factor structure of the PCM.
Methods:
The PCM was administered within various oncology clinics at our institution from 2006 to 2011 as part of standard of care, yielding a large (n = 5624) and diverse data set. An exploratory factor analysis was performed.
Results:
The PCM performed well in terms of missing values and floor and ceiling effects. The three scales postulated by the PCM developers exhibited high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.94-0.95); the six subscales exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.80-0.95). A three-factor model approximated simple structure and was consistent with the constructs of emotional function, physical function, and physical symptoms suggested by the PCM developers. However, a six-factor model did not support the division of these three constructs into subscales of despair, distress, ambulation, impaired performance, treatment side effects, and general physical symptoms. Instead, we observed an emotional factor, a physical functioning factor, a factor including many of the treatment side effects, and three factors consisting of various clusters of physical symptoms.
Conclusion:
Although six subscales postulated by its developers perform reasonably, allocation of the PCM items to three constructs is more accurate and likely more consistent with how symptoms and concerns are conceptualized by patients.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Factorial Design
Self-Report Tests of Personality