Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
Published on: November 30, 2022
Genomic Databases and Biobanks in Denmark
1Professor of Health Law at the Faculty of Law at the University of Copenhagen, where she is heading the Centre for Legal Studies in Welfare and Market. She has a Ph.D. in Law from the University of Copenhagen in Denmark (1993) and an LL.D. in Law from the University of Copenhagen in Denmark (2006).
Danish biobanking regulations vary, with tissue samples treated differently than whole genome sequencing data. Current laws create inconsistencies, particularly regarding patient autonomy and research ethics review for future studies.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Genomic Medicine
- Health Law
Background:
- Biobanking in Denmark is governed by a complex web of laws, including patients' rights, data protection, and research ethics reviews.
- Danish law classifies tissue samples as personal data, subjecting them to various regulations based on collection circumstances.
- A notable disparity exists in the regulation of biobank samples versus whole genome sequencing (WGS) data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the current regulatory landscape of biobanking in Denmark.
- To identify inconsistencies and potential areas for improvement in the legal framework governing biobank research.
- To examine the differential treatment of tissue samples and WGS data.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing Danish legislation pertaining to patient rights, data protection, and research ethics.
- Comparative analysis of regulatory requirements for biobank samples and WGS data.
- Examination of ethical considerations, particularly concerning patient autonomy and consent.
Main Results:
- Tissue samples are subject to a multi-layered regulatory approach, including ethics review, data protection, and patient rights.
- Information derived from WGS is regulated solely under data protection laws, despite its sensitive nature.
- Biobanks established for unspecified future research bypass research ethics review, and patient-collected samples are treated differently than those from research participants.
Conclusions:
- The current regulatory framework for biobanking in Denmark is fragmented and presents inconsistencies.
- The differing treatment of tissue samples and WGS data, as well as variations in consent requirements, warrants re-evaluation.
- Increased national attention on biobank-based research may foster a more unified and coherent regulatory approach.
Related Concept Videos
Genomics
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

