Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Essential features of a faculty evaluation program.

R S Mackenzie

    Journal of Dental Education
    |June 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A comprehensive faculty evaluation system, developed collaboratively, aims to reduce bias through diverse data collection. This system supports faculty improvement by linking to development programs and reward structures, ensuring clear criteria and goals.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Melatonin induction of filamentous structures in non-neuronal cells that is dependent on expression of the human mt1 melatonin receptor.

    Cell motility and the cytoskeleton·2000
    Same author

    Utilization of lumbosacral spine radiographs for the evaluation of low back pain in the emergency department.

    The Journal of emergency medicine·1999
    Same author

    The Pew National Dental Education Program at the University of Florida College of Dentistry.

    Journal of dental education·1990
    Same author

    A clinical comparison of lidocaine and bupivacaine.

    Annals of emergency medicine·1987
    Same author

    Inquiry teaching in clinical periodontics.

    Journal of dental education·1987
    Same author

    Subjective influences in the grant review process.

    Journal of dental education·1986
    Same journal

    Redefining Graduation Competency for Clinical Skills Assessment: A Conceptual Proposal Originating From Periodontal Education.

    Journal of dental education·2026
    Same journal

    Entrustment and Practice Readiness: Learner Experiences With Implementing Longitudinal Assessment Using Entrustable Professional Activities.

    Journal of dental education·2026
    Same journal

    Smile beyond Borders: Gender, Academic Level, and Contextual Cross-Cultural Smile Self-Perception among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students.

    Journal of dental education·2026
    Same journal

    Impact of AI-Generated Feedback on Dental Student Performance in Preclinical Prosthodontics Education.

    Journal of dental education·2026
    Same journal

    An Exploratory Comparative Analysis of Mixed Reality Simulation Versus 3D-Printed Models for Undergraduate Training in Third Molar Removal.

    Journal of dental education·2026
    Same journal

    Preparing for Evolving Roles: Variation in Dental Hygiene and Therapy Practice.

    Journal of dental education·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Academic Administration

    Background:

    • Current faculty evaluation methods may suffer from personal bias and subjective judgments.
    • A need exists for a more objective and comprehensive faculty assessment approach in academic settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a faculty evaluation system designed to enhance objectivity and support professional development.
    • To outline key components for an effective and equitable faculty evaluation framework.

    Main Methods:

    • Collaboration between evaluation specialists and dental faculty.
    • Utilization of a broad spectrum of data from multiple sources.
    • Clear advance specification of evaluation criteria linked to faculty duties and institutional goals.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • A system that minimizes personal bias and subjective judgments.
    • Integration with faculty development programs and reward systems for improved performance.
    • Defined standards for rewards and sanctions, with clear operational guidelines for participants.

    Conclusions:

    • A well-designed faculty evaluation system, developed collaboratively, can effectively reduce bias and promote faculty growth.
    • Linking evaluations to development and rewards, with clear criteria and goals, is crucial for an effective system.
    • The system must be cost-effective and adequately resourced to ensure its success and impact.