Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Radial Interventions: Present and Future Indications
Konstantinos V Voudris1, Panagiota Georgiadou2, Konstantinos Charitakis3
1University of Illinois at Chicago, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 W 95th Street, Oak Lawn, Chicago, IL, 60453, USA. kvoudris@uic.edu.
Insights
The transradial approach for cardiovascular procedures is safe, effective, and cost-efficient. It offers benefits like shorter hospital stays and improved patient satisfaction, making it the preferred method for most coronary interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access Techniques
Background:
- Radial access has evolved significantly for cardiovascular procedures.
- Numerous studies confirm the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of radial catheterization.
- It presents a viable alternative to the traditional femoral approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the advancements and benefits of the transradial approach.
- To establish the transradial approach as a preferred vascular access route.
- To underscore its advantages in coronary interventions, including acute myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing studies and clinical data on radial access.
- Comparative analysis of radial versus femoral approaches.
- Evaluation of safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- Radial catheterization demonstrates significant safety and efficacy.
- It leads to shorter hospital stays and reduced patient costs.
- Lower rates of access site complications and higher patient satisfaction are observed.
Conclusions:
- The transradial approach is a safe and effective alternative to the femoral approach.
- It offers enhanced patient satisfaction and reduced complications.
- It has become the preferred vascular access route for most coronary interventions, including in acute myocardial infarction cases.
Opinion Statement:
Since its first introduction, radial access for diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures has progressively evolved with advances in understanding, capabilities, and ease of operation. Numerous studies have demonstrated its safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Overall, radial catheterization is a valid alternative to the femoral approach with additional benefits of shorter length of hospital stay and reduced patient costs when performed by experienced interventionists. Moreover, with reduced rates of access site complications and enhanced patient satisfaction, the transradial approach has emerged as the preferred vascular access route for most coronary interventions, even in cases of acute myocardial infarction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Radial System Protection
In a radial system with a fault downstream of the third breaker, ideally, only the third breaker will open, isolating the fault and interrupting the load connected beyond it. The second breaker has a longer delay setting,...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius
The radius has a nail-shaped head, and a...
Spinal Nerves: Plexus I
The Cervical Plexus
The cervical plexus, formed by the anterior rami of the first four...

