Is Trust for Sale? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation for Repairing Competence- versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Tessa Haesevoets1, Chris Reinders Folmer1,2, Alain Van Hiel1
1Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract:
Despite the popularity of financial compensation as a means for addressing trust violations, the question whether (more) money can indeed buy trust back remains largely unexplored. In the present research, we focus on the role of violation type and compensation size. The results of a scenario study and a laboratory experiment show that financial compensation can effectively promote the restoration of trust for transgressions that indicate a lack of competence. Conversely, for transgressions which signal a lack of integrity, financial compensation is not an effective tool to repair trust. Moreover, our findings indicate that for both violation types, overcompensation has no positive effects on top of the impact of equal compensation. These findings therefore show that when it comes to trust, money cannot buy everything.
Related Concept Videos
Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Equity Theory
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Obedience
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

