Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

29.7K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
29.7K
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

2.0K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
2.0K
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

17.3K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
17.3K
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

15.7K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
15.7K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

12.5K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
12.5K
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

976
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
976

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Prior Hamstring Strain Injury on Muscle Morphology and Sprinting Biomechanics in Collegiate American Football Athletes.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2026
Same author

Standardized Effect Measures Informing Next-Generation Strategies for Mechanical Stimulation in Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Recent developments in computational modelling of the knee.

Osteoarthritis imaging·2026
Same author

Running Speed is Maximized by Strengthening the Hip Flexors and Hip Adductors.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Hip Joint Loading During Walking Is Associated With Cartilage Defect Severity in Young Adult Football Players With Hip/Groin Pain.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2026
Same author

Effects of shoeing on forelimb biomechanics in walking horses.

Equine veterinary journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.4K

Direct Methods for Predicting Movement Biomechanics Based Upon Optimal Control Theory with Implementation in OpenSim.

Sina Porsa1, Yi-Chung Lin1, Marcus G Pandy2

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|December 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Direct collocation significantly outperforms direct shooting for optimal control problems in human movement simulation. This method achieves similar results up to 249 times faster, enhancing computational efficiency in biomechanics research.

Keywords:
Direct collocationDirect shootingMotion trackingMusculoskeletal modelPredictive simulationTrajectory optimization

More Related Videos

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.4K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.8K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Computational Science
  • Human Movement Analysis

Background:

  • Solving large-scale, nonlinear optimal control problems in human movement is computationally intensive.
  • Direct shooting and direct collocation are two common numerical methods for these problems.
  • Accurate computational models are crucial for understanding human locomotion and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the computational performance of direct shooting and direct collocation for human movement optimal control.
  • To evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of these methods using a large-scale musculoskeletal model.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented direct shooting and direct collocation algorithms within the OpenSim musculoskeletal modeling platform.
  • Utilized an 8-segment, 48-muscle body model to simulate maximum-height jumping.
  • Compared convergence speed and solution accuracy between the two direct methods.

Main Results:

  • Direct collocation was up to 249 times faster than direct shooting, converging in 3.4 hours versus 35.3 days.
  • Both methods produced comparable optimal control solutions when using the same initial guess.
  • Model predictions showed good agreement with experimental data for joint angles, ground reaction forces, and muscle activations.

Conclusions:

  • Direct collocation offers exceptional computational performance for large-scale musculoskeletal models.
  • This method is highly suitable for predictive simulations of human movement.
  • Computational time is sensitive to the initial guess, highlighting its importance for efficient simulations.