Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

36
Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
36
Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.4K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.4K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

43.9K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.9K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.9K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.5K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insufficient evidence to conclude that confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Nudging cooperation among agents in an experimental social network.

Applied network science·2023
Same author

Information acquisition and cognitive processes during strategic decision-making: Combining a policy-capturing study with eye-tracking data.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Sustained decline in tobacco purchasing in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Communications medicine·2022
Same author

Cognitive fatigue influences students' performance on standardized tests.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2016
Same author

Pay dispersion and performance in teams.

PloS one·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.3K

Nudge for (the Public) Good: How Defaults Can Affect Cooperation.

Toke R Fosgaard1, Marco Piovesan2

  • 1University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Plos One
|December 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Non-binding defaults influenced stated strategies in public good games. Even without defaults, prior exposure to free-rider nudges reduced future cooperation.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.5K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.3K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.5K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Game Theory
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding factors influencing contributions to public goods is crucial.
  • Defaults can subtly guide decision-making, even when non-binding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of non-binding defaults on public good contributions.
  • To examine whether default choices influence stated strategies and subsequent behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of default contribution levels in a public goods game.
  • Assessing subject responses to defaults and their behavior in a subsequent, non-manipulated repeated public goods game.

Main Results:

  • Most subjects did not adopt the default values but were influenced in their stated strategy.
  • Exposure to a 'free-rider' default significantly decreased cooperation in a later, standard public goods game.

Conclusions:

  • Non-binding defaults can shape cooperative behavior and have lasting effects.
  • Defaults serve as social cues that influence individual contributions to public goods.