Atrial reverse remodelling is associated with outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy
Mariëlle Kloosterman1, Michiel Rienstra1, Bart A Mulder1
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, Groningen RB 9700, The Netherlands.
Insights
Atrial reverse remodelling improves cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes. Patients without atrial or ventricular remodelling had the worst prognosis, highlighting its prognostic value.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a key treatment for heart failure.
- Atrial remodelling can impact CRT efficacy.
- Prognostic markers for CRT response are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic significance of atrial reverse remodelling (ARR) in patients undergoing CRT.
- To determine if ARR influences long-term outcomes after CRT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 365 patients receiving CRT at University Medical Centre Groningen.
- ARR defined as ≥10% reduction in left atrial volume index at 6 months.
- CRT success defined as ventricular reverse remodelling (≥15% LVESV reduction).
- Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalizations.
Main Results:
- Patients with no ARR and no ventricular reverse remodelling had the worst outcomes (HR 3.1, P=0.006).
- Outcomes for patients with ARR alone were comparable to those with both ARR and ventricular reverse remodelling (HR 2.0, P=0.21).
- Mean follow-up was 2.0 ± 1.0 years, with 49 deaths.
Conclusions:
- Absence of both atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling is associated with the poorest prognosis after CRT.
- Atrial reverse remodelling alone is linked to improved left ventricular diastolic filling and comparable outcomes to combined remodelling.
- Assessing atrial reverse remodelling offers valuable prognostic information for CRT outcomes.
Aims:
To study the prognostic effect of atrial reverse remodelling on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Methods And Results:
Patients receiving a CRT device in the University Medical Centre Groningen were included. Atrial reverse remodelling was defined as a ≥10% reduction in left atrial volume index at 6-month follow-up. Success of CRT was defined as ventricular reverse remodelling with a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥15% at 6-month follow-up. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalizations. A total of 365 patients (mean age 65.1 ± 11.0 years, 73% men) were included; among them, 221 (61%) were in sinus rhythm and had no prior atrial fibrillation (AF), and 144 patients (39%) had a history of AF. During a mean follow up of 2.0 ± 1.0 years, 49 patients died. Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with no atrial and no ventricular reverse remodelling had the worst outcome (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-7.1, P = 0.006). Outcome in patients with only atrial reverse remodelling was comparable with outcome in patients with both atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 0.7-5.6, P = 0.21).
Conclusion:
Patients without atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling have the worst outcome. Patients with only atrial reverse remodelling have improved left ventricular diastolic filling during follow-up and demonstrate a comparable outcome with patients with both atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling. Assessment of atrial reverse remodelling may provide additional prognostic information in determining CRT outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management


