Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Implication of ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake of Affected Axillary Lymph Nodes in Cases with Breast Cancer
Takaaki Fujii1, Reina Yajima2, Hironori Tatsuki2
1Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan ftakaaki@gunma-u.ac.jp.
Abstract:
In order to evaluate affected axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer by positron-emission tomography using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET), an understanding of FDG avidity is important. In the present study, we examined whether certain factors, including lymphatic spread and size of metastatic lymph nodes, were associated with FDG avidity in order to evaluate the benefits of a FDG-PET assessment of axillary node metastases. We retrospectively investigated the cases of 179 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer who underwent FDG-PET preoperatively. Among the 179 patients, 48 (26.8%) had axillary lymph node metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and false-negative rates in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status by FDG-PET were 47.9%, 98.5%, 84.9%, and 52.1%, respectively. The 48 cases with lymph node metastases were divided into two groups based on the presence or not of FDG uptake in the axillary lesions. Clinicopathological features of the primary tumor, including tumor size, standardized uptake value (SUVmax and biomarkers, were not statistically significant factors; only the clinicopathological features of metastatic lymph nodes, including the size of node metastasis, were significantly associated with FDG uptake in the axillary lymph nodes. Among the eight cases of micrometastasis, seven were not detected by FDG-PET. The number of cases with only one affected node was significantly higher in the group without FDG uptake in the axillary lesion. Although the number of lymph node metastases was relatively higher in the FDG-PET-positive patients, the difference was not statistically significant. FDG-PET may help identify patients with high axillary lymph node burden. Our findings imply that preoperative FDG-PET evaluation of lymph nodes is not sufficient to predict lymphatic spread or micrometastasis because FDG avidity is mainly influenced by the size of the tumor.
More Related Videos
10:04Radionuclide-fluorescence Reporter Gene Imaging to Track Tumor Progression in Rodent Tumor Models
Published on: March 13, 2018
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017