Related Experiment Videos
Learning Through New Approaches to Forest Governance: Evidence from Harrop-Procter Community Forest, Canada
Felicitas Egunyu1, Maureen G Reed2, John A Sinclair3
1School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Rm 327 Kirk Hall, 117 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C8, Canada. Felicitas.egunyu@usask.ca.
Environmental Management
|January 4, 2016
Summary
Social learning in community forestry can be restricted over time as organizations focus on compliance. This study found that increased professionalism led to fewer learning opportunities for most participants.
Area of Science:
- Environmental governance
- Forestry management
- Social learning theory
Background:
- Collaborative forest governance is seen as key to sustainable forestry, enabling community participation and resource benefit.
- Social learning within these arrangements can build capacity for complex problem-solving.
- Limited understanding exists on the long-term evolution of social learning, its influencers, and impact on management effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the temporal dynamics of social learning outcomes in collaborative forest governance.
- To identify how social learning evolves over time within a Canadian community forest setting.
Main Methods:
- In-depth case study of a community forest in Canada.
- Data collection through personal interviews, focus group meetings, and participant observation.
Main Results:
- Most participants gained knowledge through active participation in forest management activities.
- As the community forest organization prioritized legislative compliance, learning opportunities and outcomes became more limited.
- Increased focus on meeting governmental requirements professionalized the organization but reduced broader involvement and learning.
Conclusions:
- The study's findings challenge the assumption that social learning continuously expands in collaborative governance over time.
- Professionalization and regulatory compliance can inadvertently restrict social learning and participation.
- Further research is needed to understand the evolving relationships within collaborative governance and their impact on social learning.