Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management01:29

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

760
Diagnosing and managing appendicitis requires a structured and comprehensive approach that spans from initial assessment to postoperative care. Here is an overview of the process:
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
760

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reporting and data systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with findings of a user adoption survey.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Identification of circulating microRNA signature in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis patients from Indian population.

Gene·2026
Same author

Author's response.

The National medical journal of India·2025
Same author

Malignant transformation in giant sebaceous cysts: Uncommon but not impossible.

The National medical journal of India·2024
Same author

Bouveret's syndrome: a rare presentation of a common surgical enigma.

Journal of surgical case reports·2024
Same author

Interplay of Anisotropy Energy Barrier and Self-Heating Efficiency of Cobalt-Substituted CuFe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Nanoparticles.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.0K

Conventional Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Laparoscope-Assisted Appendicectomy: a Comparative Study.

Mayank Baid1, Manoranjan Kar2, Utpal De1

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Medical College, 88 College Street, Kolkata, 700 073 West Bengal India.

The Indian Journal of Surgery
|January 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is superior to laparoscope-assisted appendicectomy (LAA). LA offers shorter surgery times, fewer complications, and quicker patient recovery, making it a preferred minimally invasive option.

Keywords:
Laparoscope-assisted appendicectomy (LAA)Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA)

More Related Videos

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection
06:46

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection

Published on: January 9, 2026

332
Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.0K
Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection
06:46

Caudal-to-cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolon Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection

Published on: January 9, 2026

332
Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic appendicectomy is popular but faces criticism regarding technical difficulty, time, and cost.
  • Three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and laparoscope-assisted appendicectomy (LAA) are minimally invasive alternatives to conventional appendicectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and outcomes of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) versus laparoscope-assisted appendicectomy (LAA).

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of 77 patients undergoing either LA (39 patients) or LAA (38 patients) between August 2010 and January 2012.
  • Data collected on surgical completion rates, operative time, complications (bleeding, conversion to open), postoperative pain, wound infections, and hospital stay.

Main Results:

  • LA had a 100% completion rate, while LAA had a 84.2% completion rate, with 5 LAA cases converted to LA and 1 to open appendicectomy.
  • LA demonstrated significantly shorter mean surgical duration (18.18 min vs. 24.39 min) compared to LAA.
  • LAA showed higher incidences of wound infections (6 vs. 2), severe postoperative pain (8 vs. 2), and longer hospital stays, with only 28.9% of LAA patients discharged by day 2 versus 79.5% for LA patients.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is a more effective and safer minimally invasive procedure than laparoscope-assisted appendicectomy (LAA).
  • LAA is associated with increased operative time, higher complication rates, more postoperative pain and wound infections, and prolonged hospital stays.
  • LA is recommended as the preferred minimally invasive approach for appendicectomy, particularly for patients with higher BMI.