Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Properties of Organometallic Compounds01:23

Properties of Organometallic Compounds

2.1K
Organometallic compounds are compounds that contain a carbon–metal bond. Carbon belongs to an organyl group like alkyl, aryl, allyl, or benzyl groups. The metal can be from Group I or Group II of the periodic table, a transition metal, or a semimetal.
2.1K
Metal-Ligand Bonds02:51

Metal-Ligand Bonds

25.6K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
25.6K
Metallic Solids02:37

Metallic Solids

21.3K
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
21.3K
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes02:58

Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes

31.7K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
31.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a Novel Diagnostic Modality for Upper Airway Obstruction in Neonates.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Mothers and fathers in the criminal justice system and children's child protective services involvement.

Child abuse & neglect·2020
Same author

A systematic typology for negative Poisson's ratio materials and the prediction of complete auxeticity in pure silica zeolite JST.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2015
Same author

Mental incapacity in hospitalised patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2011
Same author

Deformation mechanisms leading to auxetic behaviour in the α-cristobalite and α-quartz structures of both silica and germania.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2011
Same author

What is the use of biopsy and antibodies in coeliac disease diagnosis?

Journal of internal medicine·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Experimental Approaches for the Synthesis of Low-Valent Metal-Organic Frameworks from Multitopic Phosphine Linkers
07:14

Author Spotlight: Experimental Approaches for the Synthesis of Low-Valent Metal-Organic Frameworks from Multitopic Phosphine Linkers

Published on: May 12, 2023

3.9K

Flexibility in MOFs: do scalar and group-theoretical counting rules work?

A Marmier1, K E Evans1

  • 1College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Science, University of Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK. a.s.h.marmier@exeter.ac.uk.

Dalton Transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)
|January 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Engineering counting rules can predict flexibility in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Group-theoretical methods accurately identify flexible mechanisms, unlike simpler scalar rules, aiding MOF design.

More Related Videos

Synthesis and Characterization of Functionalized Metal-organic Frameworks
11:27

Synthesis and Characterization of Functionalized Metal-organic Frameworks

Published on: September 5, 2014

49.5K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites
06:48

Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites

Published on: June 14, 2024

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Experimental Approaches for the Synthesis of Low-Valent Metal-Organic Frameworks from Multitopic Phosphine Linkers
07:14

Author Spotlight: Experimental Approaches for the Synthesis of Low-Valent Metal-Organic Frameworks from Multitopic Phosphine Linkers

Published on: May 12, 2023

3.9K
Synthesis and Characterization of Functionalized Metal-organic Frameworks
11:27

Synthesis and Characterization of Functionalized Metal-organic Frameworks

Published on: September 5, 2014

49.5K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites
06:48

Author Spotlight: Exploring Self-Assembled MOF-Polymer Composites

Published on: June 14, 2024

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemistry
  • Mechanical Engineering

Background:

  • Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous materials with tunable properties.
  • Predicting the mechanical flexibility or rigidity of MOF structures is crucial for their application.
  • Existing engineering counting rules have shown limitations in accurately predicting MOF mechanical behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of engineering-derived counting rules for predicting MOF flexibility.
  • To compare scalar counting rules with group-theoretical approaches for mechanical analysis of MOFs.
  • To clarify the rigidity of specific MOFs like IRMOF-1.

Main Methods:

  • Application of scalar counting rules to bar-and-joint and body-and-joint assemblies representing MOFs.
  • Utilizing group-theoretical methods to analyze the mechanical degrees of freedom and constraints.
  • Detailed case studies and calculations, comparing results to molecular vibration analysis methods.

Main Results:

  • Scalar counting rules were found to be unreliable for predicting MOF flexibility.
  • Group-theoretical approaches successfully distinguished between flexible mechanisms and states of self-stress.
  • The study confirmed the existence of flexible mechanisms in certain MOF architectures and corrected interpretations of IRMOF-1 rigidity.

Conclusions:

  • Group-theoretical methods offer a robust and accessible approach for predicting MOF mechanical properties.
  • These methods provide deeper insight into MOF structural mechanics compared to simpler counting rules.
  • The findings facilitate more accurate design and prediction of flexible MOFs for various applications.