Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

1.4K
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
1.4K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

3.1K
3.1K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

17.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
17.5K
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

8.6K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
8.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

677
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
677
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

15.4K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving AlphaFold2 Performance in Virtual Screens Targeting GPCRs by Enhancing Binding-Site Conformational Sampling.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

The N-Myc MB0-MBI region interacts specifically and dynamically with the N-lobe of Aurora kinase A.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Autoimmunity-associated DIORA1 binds the MRCK family of serine/threonine kinases and controls cell motility.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Protein-Peptide Docking with ESMFold Language Model.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

AFsample2 predicts multiple conformations and ensembles with AlphaFold2.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Prediction of structural variation.

Current opinion in structural biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

14.1K

ProQ2: estimation of model accuracy implemented in Rosetta.

Karolis Uziela1, Björn Wallner2

  • 1Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|January 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary

ProQ2, a single-model method, accurately estimates protein model quality and outperforms consensus methods. This tool aids in conformational sampling and improving protein structure modeling.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Protein modeling

Background:

  • Model quality assessment programs predict protein structure quality.
  • Existing methods are broadly categorized into ensemble and single-model approaches.
  • Consensus methods correlate well with true quality but struggle to identify the best model.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce ProQ2, an implementation for local and global protein model accuracy estimation within the Rosetta modeling suite.
  • To enable large-scale batch processing and conformational sampling using machine learning-based scoring functions.
  • To integrate model accuracy estimation into existing protein modeling workflows.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of the ProQ2 program for protein model quality assessment.
  • Utilizing Rosetta modeling suite for integrated analysis.
  • Benchmarking ProQ2 using data from CASP11 and CAMEO-QE.

Main Results:

  • ProQ2 demonstrates superior performance as a single-model method for both local and global accuracy estimation.
  • The implementation facilitates local batch runs and opens avenues for conformational sampling.
  • ProQ2 was evaluated in the CASP11 competition.

Conclusions:

  • ProQ2 is a highly effective single-model method for protein model quality assessment.
  • Its integration with Rosetta enhances conformational sampling and modeling schemes.
  • ProQ2 represents a significant advancement in predicting protein structure accuracy.