Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.0K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.0K
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

1.3K
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
1.3K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

704
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
704
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

11.4K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

321
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
321
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disruption of temporo-parietal network in Alzheimer's disease and its association with memory impairment.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

Loss of BAX in a neuroblastoma patient reveals delayed apoptosis but sustained chemotherapy sensitivity.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Scale-invariant evolution: Comment on "homo informatio" by Michael Walker.

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same author

Testing and tracking in the UK: A dynamic causal modelling study.

Wellcome open research·2026
Same author

Functional neuroanatomy of musical object processing in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

The body does not keep the score: trauma, predictive coding, and the restoration of metastability.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

Empirical Bayes for Group (DCM) Studies: A Reproducibility Study.

Vladimir Litvak1, Marta Garrido2, Peter Zeidman1

  • 1The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Institute of Neurology London, UK.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|January 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study examines reproducibility in dynamic causal modeling (DCM) for group studies of event-related potentials (ERPs). Findings highlight the consistency of DCM results across different data, models, and analysis methods, ensuring reliable brain connectivity insights.

Keywords:
Bayesian model reductiondynamic causal modellingempirical Bayesfixed effectsrandom effectsreproducibility

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.9K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.9K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is crucial for inferring directed connectivity in neuroimaging.
  • Reproducibility is a key concern in group studies, especially with complex models like DCM.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer high temporal resolution for studying neural dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the reproducibility of Bayesian model comparison in DCM for group ERP studies.
  • To investigate reproducibility across independent datasets, distinct DCM models, and varied inversion schemes.
  • To quantify the reliability of DCM inferences in analyzing neural dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized independent data splits (odd/even trials) for assessing reproducibility.
  • Compared classic ERP and canonical microcircuit (CMC) models within the DCM framework.
  • Evaluated reproducibility across different inversion strategies, including grand average inversion and empirical Bayes for group effects.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated consistent Bayesian model comparison results across independent data subsets.
  • Showed robust parameter inferences when comparing distinct ERP and CMC models.
  • Confirmed the reliability of group-level connectivity estimates derived from different inversion schemes.

Conclusions:

  • DCM analysis of group ERP data exhibits good reproducibility.
  • Findings support the validity and reliability of DCM for investigating effective connectivity in neuroscience.
  • The study provides confidence in applying DCM to diverse datasets and analytical approaches.