Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Legal and Ethical Considerations in Allowing Parental Exemptions From Newborn Critical Congenital Heart Disease
Lisa A Hom1, Tomas J Silber1, Kathleen Ennis-Durstine1
1a Children's National Heart Institute.
Insights
Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) is standard, but parents can opt-out for religious or personal reasons. Ethical considerations support honoring parental refusal for CCHD screening, prioritizing parental rights.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Neonatal Screening
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening is now standard in the US, added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in 2011.
- Newborn screening generally does not require explicit parental consent, but most states permit religious or personal belief exemptions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the ethical considerations surrounding parental exemptions for CCHD screening.
- To evaluate the balance between infant rights and parental autonomy in newborn screening decisions.
Main Methods:
- Ethical analysis of legal precedents regarding religious exemptions.
- Review of medical and ethical principles concerning infant rights and parental decision-making.
Main Results:
- The study highlights the ethical complexities of parental refusal for CCHD screening based on deeply held beliefs.
- It examines the legal framework for religious exemptions within the context of public health mandates.
Conclusions:
- Despite the benefits of CCHD screening, parental decisions to refuse screening on religious or personal grounds should be respected.
- The right to parental autonomy in healthcare decisions for newborns, particularly concerning CCHD screening, is a significant ethical consideration.
Abstract:
Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening is rapidly becoming the standard of care in the United States after being added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in 2011. Newborn screens typically do not require affirmative parental consent. In fact, most states allow parents to exempt their baby from receiving the required screen on the basis of religious or personally held beliefs. There are many ethical considerations implicated with allowing parents to exempt their child from newborn screening for CCHD. Considerations include the treatment of religious exemptions in our current legal system, as well as medical and ethical principles in relation to the rights of infants. Although there are significant benefits to screening newborns for CCHD, when a parent refuses for religious or personal beliefs, in the case of CCHD screening, the parental decision should stand.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Standards of Care II
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

