Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Therapeutic Index
Standards of Care II
Nursing Clinical Information System
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization
Published on: October 3, 2025
This paper introduces a new system for measuring deviations from Clinical Pathways (CPs), which are structured guidelines for patient care. The system uses a Clinical Pathway Deviation Index (CPDI) to compare patient trajectories with established guidelines. The CPDI is based on five indicators and a weighted-sum model. Three tools for modeling CPs were tested, and two proved suitable for the system. A preliminary analysis was conducted using data from 24 real patient trajectories. The results suggest that the system can detect significant deviations in care delivery. The authors propose that CPDI can be used to monitor adherence to CPs and support quality improvement efforts.
Area of Science:
Background:
Clinical Pathways (CPs) serve as structured guidelines for managing patient care. Prior research has shown that CPs help reduce variability in clinical practice. However, deviations from these pathways may lead to reduced care quality. No prior work had resolved how to systematically measure these deviations. Existing studies focus on adherence metrics but lack a comprehensive index. This gap motivated the development of a new tool. The need for a quantitative measure of pathway adherence remains unmet. Researchers have proposed various models for CPs, but none integrate multiple indicators. This paper introduces a novel approach to assess deviations from CPs.
Purpose Of The Study:
The goal of this work is to introduce a system for measuring deviations from Clinical Pathways. The system compares patient trajectories with established guidelines. The authors aim to identify significant variations in care delivery. The focus is on developing a reliable index for pathway adherence. This approach seeks to improve the ability to monitor clinical performance. The study tests the feasibility of using multiple modeling tools. The system is designed to support quality improvement initiatives. The ultimate aim is to provide a quantitative tool for evaluating care deviations.
Main Methods:
The system compares patient trajectories with Clinical Pathways using a weighted-sum model. Five indicators were selected to measure adherence to CPs. Three tools for CP modeling were tested in the system's development. Only two of these tools proved suitable for the system's requirements. The Clinical Pathway Deviation Index (CPDI) was constructed using these indicators. A preliminary analysis was conducted on data from 24 real patient trajectories. The system's performance was evaluated based on these data. The methods focus on integrating multiple indicators into a single index.
Main Results:
The Clinical Pathway Deviation Index (CPDI) was successfully constructed using five indicators. The system was tested on data from 24 real patient trajectories. Two of the three modeling tools proved effective for the system. The preliminary analysis showed the system's ability to detect significant deviations. The weighted-sum model provided a reliable measure of pathway adherence. The results suggest that the system can identify variations in care delivery. The performance of the system was consistent across the tested data. The findings support the feasibility of using CPDI in clinical settings.
Conclusions:
The system successfully compared patient trajectories with Clinical Pathways. The Clinical Pathway Deviation Index (CPDI) was shown to be a viable tool. The preliminary analysis supported the system's ability to detect deviations. The system's performance was consistent across the tested data. Two of the three modeling tools proved suitable for the system. The findings suggest that the system can support quality improvement efforts. The authors propose that CPDI can be used to monitor adherence to CPs. The study demonstrates the feasibility of using a weighted-sum model for this purpose.
The CPDI is a weighted-sum index that measures deviations from Clinical Pathways using five indicators.
The preliminary analysis used data from 24 real patient trajectories.
Only two of the three tools proved suitable for the system's requirements during testing.
The weighted-sum model integrates five indicators into a single index to measure pathway adherence.
The preliminary analysis showed the system's ability to detect significant deviations in care delivery.
The authors propose that CPDI can be used to monitor adherence to Clinical Pathways in clinical settings.