Adolescent, parent and societal preferences and willingness to pay for meningococcal B vaccine: A Discrete Choice

H S Marshall1, G Chen2, M Clarke3

  • 1Robinson Research Institute, and School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia.

Vaccine
|January 8, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Adolescents and parents prioritize meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine effectiveness, safety, and duration over cost. Higher effectiveness and fewer side effects significantly increase willingness-to-pay for MenB vaccination.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Vaccinology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccines are increasingly available, but public funding varies globally.
  • Understanding public preferences is crucial for vaccine policy and uptake.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess adolescent and parental preferences for key Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine attributes.
  • To determine willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a MenB vaccine based on effectiveness, duration, and side effect profile.

Main Methods:

  • A national cross-sectional study in Australia utilized Discrete Choice Experiment methodology.
  • Survey data collected from 2003 adults and 502 adolescents in 2013.

Main Results:

  • Higher vaccine effectiveness, longer protection duration, fewer adverse events, and lower cost increased likelihood of vaccination acceptance.
  • For an ideal MenB vaccine, adolescents and parents indicated high willingness-to-pay (AU$251.60 and AU$295.10, respectively).
  • Vaccine effectiveness and duration of immunity were significant drivers of WTP, with a slight fever being an acceptable side effect.

Conclusions:

  • Vaccine effectiveness, adverse events, and duration of immunity are critical factors influencing MenB vaccine acceptance and WTP.
  • These attributes should be central to public health discussions regarding MenB vaccine benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
10.6K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.9K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.4K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

Overview
44.9K