Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026
Optimizing the Modified No-Scalpel Vasectomy Technique
Published on: October 18, 2024
Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy
Muammer Altok1, Ali Feyzullah Şahin2, Rauf Taner Divrik2
1Department of Urology, Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.
Objectives:
There is no trial comparing bipolar cautery and ligation for occlusion of vas in non-scalpel vasectomy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these vasectomy occlusion techniques.
Materials And Methods:
Between January 2002-June 2009, patients were allocated in alternate order. We recruited 100 cases in cautery group and 100 cases in ligation group. Non-scalpel approach was performed during vasectomy and fascial interposition was performed in all cases. First semen analysis was done 3 months after vasectomy. Vasectomy success was defined as azoospermia or non-motile sperm lower than 100.000/mL.
Results:
Four patients from the cautery group were switched to the ligation group due to technical problem of cautery device. Thus, data of 96 patients as cautery group and 104 patients as ligation group were evaluated. After vasectomy, semen analyses were obtained from 59 of 96 (61.5%) patients in cautery group and to 66 of 104 (63.5%) patients in ligation group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups in terms of the success of vasectomy (p=0.863).
Conclusion:
Although bipolar cautery technique is safe, effective and feasible in non-scalpel vasectomy, it has no superiority to ligation. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the success and complications between the two groups.
