Wood Preference of Reticulitermes virginicus (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) Using No-, Two-, and Four-Choice Designs...

Three hundred Reticulitermes virginicus (Banks) workers were exposed to three 1-cm3 wood blocks of either Quercus sp. (Red Oak), Populus sp. (Poplar), Pinus sp. (Pine), or Sequoia sp. (Redwood) placed into one of the three bioassay designs (no-, two-, and four-choice) for 21 d. Termite wood consumption was measured by wood weight loss, resistance class, and visual rating. Wood consumption rates were determined using four formulas in addition to two standardized visual rating scales (American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] and American Wood Protection Association [AWPA]) and a preference ranking obtained for each measure. The wood consumption formula, rating scale, and preference rankings were compared by bioassay design. The overall preference ranking of the four wood types as determined by the combination of all three designs was—1) Pine, 2) Red Oak, 3) Redwood, and 4) Poplar. Results indicate that bioassay design influenced both wood consumption and preference rankings. A no-choice design can determine aversion; a four-choice design the most preferred wood; and a two-choice design can illuminate the fine details of comparative preference. The different formulas employed for calculation of consumption rate influenced preference ranking in the no- and four-choice designs but not the two-choice design.