Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

386
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
386
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

529
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
529
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

3.9K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.9K
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

4.2K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
4.2K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

704
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
704

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpretation of the IARC quantitative bias analysis of talc and ovarian cancer.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same author

Lack of Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Potential for Nonsugar Sweeteners: A Review of Animal and Mechanistic Evidence.

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

A Systematic Review of Nonsugar Sweeteners and Cancer Epidemiology Studies.

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

Comparative analysis of asbestos body and fiber content in formalin-fixed vs. paraffin-embedded lung tissue.

Frontiers in public health·2025
Same author

Comparison of various methodological approaches to model asbestos thresholds for mesothelioma.

Frontiers in public health·2025
Same author

Challenges in defining thresholds for health effects: some considerations for asbestos and silica.

Frontiers in epidemiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Systematic comparison of study quality criteria.

Heather N Lynch1, Julie E Goodman1, Jade A Tabony2

  • 1Gradient, 20 University Road, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|January 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study critically evaluates frameworks for assessing chemical toxicity study quality. Common themes across disciplines include reporting, bias, and confounders, enabling more objective risk assessments.

Keywords:
Evidence integrationStudy qualitySystematic review

More Related Videos

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.7K
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

21.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.7K
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

21.0K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Systematic review and chemical toxicity evaluation methods are under reconsideration.
  • Prominent reviews by committees like the National Research Council (NRC) have spurred interest.
  • Evaluating individual studies and integrating evidence are key focus areas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate available frameworks for assessing study quality in chemical toxicity.
  • To assess criteria for human, animal, and in vitro studies, as well as systematic reviews.
  • To identify commonalities across disciplines and implications for risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated multiple frameworks for study quality assessment.
  • Assessed criteria separately for different study types (human, animal, in vitro) and systematic reviews.
  • Examined cross-disciplinary commonalities and implications for risk assessment.

Main Results:

  • Frameworks varied in purpose and guidance, but shared common themes.
  • Key common themes include adequate reporting of study details, design, and protocol.
  • Other shared themes involve group selection, outcome assessment, bias avoidance, and confounder consideration.

Conclusions:

  • Identified informative study quality considerations for objective evaluation.
  • Standardized methods for evaluating studies can improve risk assessment.
  • Frameworks provide a basis for more consistent and reliable chemical toxicity assessments.