Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

704
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
704
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

14.6K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
14.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.4K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

7.0K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
7.0K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

561
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
561

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

tDNA(ser) sequences are involved in the excision of Streptomyces griseus plasmid pSG1.

Gene·1992
Same author

Expression of cytokines and their receptors by human thymocytes and thymic stromal cells.

Immunology·1992
Same author

Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma of the breast.

The Journal of the Florida Medical Association·1992
Same author

Asymmetry in visual search for targets defined by differences in movement speed.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1992
Same author

Clinical decision making for discharge planning in a changing psychiatric environment.

Health & social work·1992
Same author

Immunization of colorectal cancer patients with modified ovine submaxillary gland mucin and adjuvants induces IgM and IgG antibodies to sialylated Tn.

Cancer research·1992

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K

Robust Multivariate Analysis for the Comparison of Several Samples.

A Cohen, D Ridelman

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 9, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a robust method for comparing multivariate data from multiple groups. It uses modified Mahalanobis distances and graphical analysis for effective sample comparison.

    Area of Science:

    • Multivariate statistics
    • Biostatistics
    • Data analysis

    Background:

    • Comparing samples from different subpopulations with multivariate data presents statistical challenges.
    • Traditional methods may be sensitive to outliers and assumptions about data distribution.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a robust statistical method for comparing multivariate samples from several subpopulations.
    • To enhance Mahalanobis distance for improved sensitivity in group comparisons.

    Main Methods:

    • The proposed method involves calculating extended Mahalanobis distances for all observations relative to robustly estimated sample locations (means and covariances).
    • Informal graphical techniques are employed for analyzing these distances.
    • The approach is demonstrated using a real-world example.

    More Related Videos

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K
    Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
    08:13

    Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

    Published on: April 9, 2019

    15.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

    Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
    06:35

    Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

    Published on: July 24, 2010

    17.4K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K
    Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
    08:13

    Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

    Published on: April 9, 2019

    15.0K

    Main Results:

    • The robust estimation and graphical analysis effectively differentiate between subpopulations.
    • The method proved useful in comparing three patient groups based on thirteen nerve conduction variables.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method provides a robust and visually intuitive approach for comparing multivariate samples.
    • This technique is particularly valuable in fields like clinical research where robust data analysis is crucial.