Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
Published on: March 10, 2011
Mentored peer reviewing for PhD faculty and students
Jiayun Xu1, Kyounghae Kim2, Melissa Kurtz2
1College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract:
There is a need for scholars to be prepared as peer reviewers in order to ensure the continual publication of quality science. However, developing the skills to craft a constructive critique can be difficult. In this commentary, we discuss the use of a group peer review mentoring model for PhD students to gain experience in peer review from a faculty member who is experienced in peer review. Central to this model, was the opportunity for each student and faculty mentor to openly discuss their critique of the manuscript. Through this enriching experience, novice researchers were able to learn the elements of a good peer review, better determine a manuscript's substantive contribution to science, and advance the quality of their own manuscript writing.
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Proofreading
Feedback Inhibition
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Feedback Loops
Phosphorylation
During phosphorylation, protein kinases transfer the terminal phosphate group of ATP to specific amino acid side chains of substrate proteins. Serine, threonine, and tyrosine are the most commonly...

