Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.6K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resource-rational contractualism can also explain personal moral judgments.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

A Metacognitive Appraisal of Quitting in Chess.

Cognitive science·2026
Same author

The attraction effect in perceptual decision-making: a case of dominance asymmetry.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Perceived temporal distortions may explain the effect of precarity on intertemporal choices.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Dynamics of mental imagery.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

Present-Focused Behavior as a Rational Adaptation to Precarity.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same journal

Limits to Language Prediction: Findings From Diverse Populations.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

There Is More Than Meets the Eye: The Dual Role of Perception in Shaping Color Lexicons.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Gesture Use Across Different Concepts: Focusing on Cross-Linguistic Diversity.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Exploring Amazonian Cognitive Diversity at Chana Research Station.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Do (We Think That) Plants Have Agency?

Topics in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies
07:34

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies

Published on: November 7, 2025

462

Attention Modulates Spatial Precision in Multiple-Object Tracking.

Nisheeth Srivastava1, Ed Vul1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.

Topics in Cognitive Science
|January 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a computational model for multiple-object tracking, revealing how visual attention allocation impacts tracking accuracy. It shows attention enhances resolution at attended locations while increasing errors elsewhere.

Keywords:
Attention dynamicsBayesian models of cognitionComputational cognitive scienceMetacognitionMultiple-object trackingVisual cognition

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies
07:34

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies

Published on: November 7, 2025

462
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Multiple-object tracking (MOT) is crucial for understanding visual attention.
  • Previous models predict overall performance but lack trial-level detail.
  • The interplay between cognitive and perceptual resources in MOT remains incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational model predicting trial-level visual attention allocation in MOT.
  • To elucidate the relationship between attention allocation and tracking accuracy.
  • To differentiate between macro-scale (stimulus complexity) and micro-scale (trial-specific interactions) effects on tracking performance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model of MOT incorporating attention allocation.
  • Utilized a combination of empirical and computational experiments.
  • Modeled attention as enhancing spatial resolution in attended locations.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a tight coupling between cognitive (attention) and perceptual (tracking) resources.
  • Showed low-level tracking generates error predictions, while high-level attention modulates these predictions.
  • The model accurately predicts both overall tracking difficulty and trial-specific variations in performance.

Conclusions:

  • Visual attention dynamically modulates spatial resolution and error likelihood in MOT.
  • The model provides a mechanistic account of how attention influences MOT performance at a fine-grained level.
  • This work advances our understanding of attentional resource allocation in complex visual tasks.