Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

08:52
Applications of Immobilization of Drosophila Tissues with Fibrin Clots for Live Imaging
Published on: December 22, 2020
3.8K
Undersampled linogram trajectory for fast imaging (ULTI): experiments at 3 T and 7 T
Ali Ersoz1, L Tugan Muftuler2,3
1Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
NMR in Biomedicine
|January 12, 2016
Summary
Linogram acquisition offers sharper MRI images with fewer artifacts compared to radial sampling. This advanced method enhances image quality even at high acceleration rates, improving anatomical detail.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Image Reconstruction
- Medical Imaging Physics
Background:
- Undersampled data in MRI necessitates advanced reconstruction techniques.
- Parallel imaging methods accelerate data acquisition but can introduce artifacts.
- Evaluating novel sampling schemes is crucial for improving MRI performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance of linogram acquisition for image reconstruction from undersampled MRI data.
- To compare linogram sampling with conventional radial sampling regarding image sharpness and artifacts.
- To assess the feasibility of linogram acquisition at high acceleration rates in both phantom and in vivo studies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the point spread function (PSF) for linogram sampling to assess image sharpness and artifacts.
- Implementation of generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisition (PC-ASL) for linogram sampling.
- Comparison using simulations, phantom experiments at 3 Tesla, and in vivo human scanning at 7 Tesla.
Main Results:
- Linogram sampling demonstrated a sharper PSF and lower mean artifact power than radial sampling.
- Simulations showed lower reconstruction errors with linogram sampling.
- Phantom experiments preserved fine details and sharp edges with linogram sampling, unlike radial sampling which caused blurring.
- In vivo scans at 7T yielded high-quality anatomical images with linogram acquisition at high acceleration rates.
Conclusions:
- Linogram acquisition provides sharper images with fewer artifacts than radial sampling.
- It retains the benefits of radial sampling, including motion insensitivity and high acceleration rates.
- Linogram sampling is less susceptible to off-resonance artifacts, offering superior image quality in MRI.

