Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

15:00
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Published on: August 18, 2023
4.6K
Adaptive Protein Evolution in Animals and the Effective Population Size Hypothesis
1Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution UMR5554, Université Montpellier-CNRS-IRD-EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Plos Genetics
|January 12, 2016
Summary
Adaptive protein evolution significantly impacts most animal species, contrary to human and primate patterns. While larger populations show more adaptation, this is due to reduced neutral evolution, not faster adaptive rates.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Genetics
- Molecular Evolution
- Genomics
Background:
- The rate of genome adaptation and prevalence of adaptive processes in molecular evolution are debated.
- Previous studies on adaptive rates focused on model organisms, yielding diverse patterns and lacking a comprehensive overview.
- Discrepancies in adaptive rates between species like Drosophila and humans were hypothesized to relate to effective population size.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the genome-wide rate of adaptation through amino-acid substitution across a broader range of species.
- To investigate the influence of effective population size on adaptive and nearly-neutral evolutionary processes.
- To provide a homogeneous dataset and methodology for comparing adaptive protein evolution across diverse animal taxa.
Main Methods:
- Developed extended estimators for amino-acid adaptive rates, modeling the impact of favorable mutations on non-synonymous polymorphism.
- Compiled a new, homogeneous dataset of 44 non-model animal species pairs for analysis.
- Applied the developed methods to analyze adaptive substitution patterns and their correlation with effective population size.
Main Results:
- Adaptive evolution significantly contributes to amino-acid substitution across most metazoan phyla, with humans and primates as notable exceptions.
- A positive correlation was observed between the proportion of adaptive amino-acid substitution and species' effective population size.
- This correlation is mainly driven by a reduced rate of nearly-neutral amino-acid substitution in larger populations due to more efficient purifying selection.
Conclusions:
- Adaptive processes are dominant in protein evolution for most animal species studied.
- The hypothesis that adaptive substitutions accumulate faster in larger populations is not supported by these findings.
- Results highlight the importance of purifying selection in large populations and offer insights into factors affecting adaptive evolution rates and positive selection detection across species.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
17.7K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.7K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
77.4K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.4K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
65.8K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
65.8K
Limits to Natural Selection
35.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.8K
Genetic Drift
45.1K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
45.1K
The Evidence for Evolution
50.0K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
50.0K

