Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method
Published on: February 19, 2021
Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions
Katherine M Appleton1, Ann Hemingway2, Laure Saulais3
1Research Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole House, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK. k.appleton@bournemouth.ac.uk.
Increasing vegetable intake is challenging, with most interventions showing small, inconsistent results. Environmental, educational, and multi-component strategies show more promise, but long-term effectiveness needs further study.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Public Health Interventions
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- High fruit and vegetable consumption offers health benefits, but specific impacts of vegetables are increasingly recognized.
- Despite known benefits, vegetable intake remains low, with significant barriers to increasing consumption.
- Existing research highlights a distinction between fruit and vegetables regarding health impacts and consumption patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review published literature on interventions designed to increase vegetable intake as a distinct food group.
- To identify strategies employed in interventions aimed at boosting vegetable consumption.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different intervention approaches.
Main Methods:
- Searched PubMed, PsychInfo, and Medline databases up to April 2015.
- Utilized pre-specified search terms to identify relevant studies.
- Included all studies reporting interventions to increase vegetable intake.
Main Results:
- Identified 77 studies detailing 140 interventions, with 81% conducted in children.
- Interventions focused on hedonic factors (72), environmental factors (39), cognitive factors (19), or combined strategies (10).
- 83% of interventions reported some increase in vegetable acceptance, selection, or consumption, though effects were generally small and inconsistent.
Conclusions:
- Environmental, educational, and multi-component interventions show higher success rates, but publication bias is probable.
- Long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of interventions are rarely assessed, necessitating a focus on sustained behavior change.
- Certain population groups are underrepresented in current intervention research.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Dietary Connections
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Urinary Tract Calculi IV: Nutrition Therapy and Prevention