Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.

European urology·2016
Same author

Differential Diagnosis of Intraductal Lesions of the Prostate.

The American journal of surgical pathology·2016
Same author

Benign Mimickers of Prostate Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy and Transurethral Resection.

Surgical pathology clinics·2016
Same author

Mesenchymal Tumors of the Prostate.

Surgical pathology clinics·2016
Same author

Should the involvement of skeletal muscle by prostatic adenocarcinoma be reported on biopsies?

Human pathology·2016
Same author

Prostate-specific Antigen Mass Density--A Measure Predicting Prostate Cancer Volume and Accounting for Overweight and Obesity-related Prostate-specific Antigen Hemodilution.

Urology·2016
Same journal

Assessing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights From Clinical Practice Into Scoring Criteria, Histologic Subtypes, and Genomic Characteristics Across Disease Sites.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Cross-Reactivity of TPIT Antibody Clone OTI2G1 in Chordoma: Structural Mechanisms and Diagnostic Implications.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Paracoccidioidomycosis at Autopsy: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of Cytology Diagnosis for Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Assessment by the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Slide Program.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Guidance Conflict: A Call to Harmonize.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.4K

Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.

Oleksandr N Kryvenko1, Jonathan I Epstein

  • 1From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Urology, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (Dr Kryvenko); and the Departments of Pathology, Urology, and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Epstein).

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|January 13, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Gleason grading system for prostate cancer has evolved since 1966. A new Grade Group system (1-5) has been developed and validated to improve prostate cancer grading accuracy.

More Related Videos

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

1.4K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

1.4K
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

1.4K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Uropathology
  • Oncologic Histology

Background:

  • The original Gleason grading system, established in 1966, has limitations due to evolving diagnostic practices and the identification of new prostate cancer variants.
  • Patterns 1 and 2 are rarely diagnosed, and the original system did not account for reporting multiple biopsy cores or separate tumor nodules on radical prostatectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe updates to prostate cancer grading.
  • To introduce and discuss the new Grade Group grading system (1-5).

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical changes in prostate cancer grading practices.
  • Description of the development and validation of the new Grade Group system.

Main Results:

  • The Gleason system has undergone revisions by the International Society of Urological Pathology in 2005 and 2014.
  • A new Grade Group system (1-5) was developed at Johns Hopkins and validated in multi-institutional studies.

Conclusions:

  • The new Grade Group system offers an updated approach to prostate cancer grading.
  • This system has been accepted by pathologists and clinicians, aiming to enhance diagnostic consistency and patient management.