Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
General Movements in preterm infants undergoing craniosacral therapy: a randomised controlled pilot-trial
Wolfgang Raith1, Peter B Marschik2,3, Constanze Sommer4
1Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, Graz, 8036, Austria. wolfgang.raith@klinikum-graz.at.
Craniosacral therapy (CST) showed no significant changes in General Movements (GMs) for preterm infants compared to standard care. This osteopathic manipulative treatment appears safe for preterm infants, with no observed negative effects on neurodevelopmental assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment
- Neurodevelopmental assessment
Background:
- Craniosacral therapy (CST) is a gentle osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) utilizing soft kinaesthetic stimulation.
- Investigating the neurological short-term effects of CST in preterm infants is crucial for understanding its potential benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the neurological short-term effects of craniosacral therapy in preterm infants.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of CST as an intervention for preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- 30 preterm infants (25-33 weeks gestational age) were randomized into CST intervention or standard care groups.
- General Movement Assessment (GMA) and General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS) were used to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
- A linear mixed model analyzed GMOS, with session, time point, and intervention as fixed effects.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in the global GMA (primary outcome) between the CST and control groups.
- The GMOS (secondary outcome) did not change significantly over sessions or between groups.
- A trend towards higher GMOS values before and after the first session was noted in the control group compared to the intervention group.
Conclusions:
- Craniosacral therapy did not result in significant changes in General Movements for preterm infants compared to standard care.
- The study indicates that craniosacral therapy is a safe intervention for preterm infants, as evidenced by the lack of deterioration in neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- Further research may explore long-term effects and specific applications of CST in neonatal care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Somatic Spinal Reflexes
One of the most well-known somatic spinal reflexes is the stretch reflex, which is activated by the sudden stretching of a muscle. This reflex involves the activation of specialized sensory receptors called muscle spindles, which are located in the muscle tissue and detect changes in the length and speed of muscle contractions. When a muscle is suddenly...
Muscles that Move the Head
The bilateral sternocleidomastoid, or SCM, and the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles are significant head flexors. The SCM muscles originate at the sternum and clavicle and attach to the mastoid process of the temporal bone. The SCM contracts bilaterally to bend the head forward, whereas...
Anatomical Movements
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist,...
Reflex Activity
A reflex exam is a diagnostic procedure performed by a healthcare professional to evaluate the functionality of a patient's...

