Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiological risk factors for T2-T3 glottic carcinoma treated with (chemo)radiotherapy-a multicenter analysis.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Preoperative radiological compression features and their relationship with pre- and postoperative visual field defects in pituitary macroadenomas: a retrospective cohort from the neuro-ophthalmological clinic.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

[<sup>89</sup>Zr]bevacizumab PET/CT imaging of vestibular schwannomas for the prediction of bevacizumab treatment effect in patients with symptomatic <i>NF2</i>-related schwannomatosis: a study protocol for a phase II single centre, prospective, feasibility trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Incorporating softmax in psychophysical detection models for normal and electric hearing.

MethodsX·2026
Same author

The current status and future of using computational models to individually optimise cochlear implant stimulation.

Expert review of medical devices·2026
Same author

Leveraging spatial cues from cochlear implant microphones to efficiently enhance speech separation in naturalistic listening scenes.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

926

Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.

Kim S van der Marel1, Jeroen J Briaire, Ron Wolterbeek

  • 11Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 2Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 3Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 4Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and 5Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Ear and Hearing
|January 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a surgical insertion guidance tool to minimize frequency mismatch during cochlear implantation. The tool optimizes electrode array insertion depth based on individual cochlear size, predicting 78.1% of final implant positions.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

926
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Otoacoustic emissions
  • Auditory neurophysiology
  • Cochlear implant technology

Background:

  • Minimizing frequency mismatch is crucial for effective cochlear implant (CI) performance.
  • Optimizing electrode array insertion depth and surgical distance is key to achieving desired frequency mapping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define optimal electrode array insertion parameters for minimal frequency mismatch.
  • To develop a surgical guidance tool using preoperative anatomical data and surgical distance for precise CI placement.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of pre- and post-operative CT scans from 336 patients with HiFocus1/HiFocus1J implants.
  • Measurement of cochlear dimensions and electrode contact positions.
  • Development and validation of insertion models using spiral fitting and general linear regression.

Main Results:

  • Minimal frequency mismatch achieved with a surgical insertion of 6.7 mm and insertion depth of 484°.
  • Cochlear size clusters (small, medium, large) showed distinct optimal insertion depths.
  • The final general linear regression model predicted 78.1% of implant position variations.

Conclusions:

  • A calculable minimal frequency mismatch aids in defining preferable electrode array positions.
  • Surgeons should target specific insertion depths (6-8 mm) based on cochlear size for minimal mismatch.
  • The developed insertion model serves as a feasible surgical guidance tool for cochlear implantation.