Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Alternative Strategies to Achieve Cardiovascular Mortality Goals in China and India: A Microsimulation of Target-
Sanjay Basu1, John S Yudkin2, Jeremy B Sussman2
1From Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (S.B.); Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.B.); Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom (J.S.Y.); Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (J.B.S., R.A.H.); Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI (J.B.S., R.A.H.); School of Public Health, Imperial College London. London, United Kingdom (C.M.); and Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India (C.M.). basus@stanford.edu.
A benefit-based tailored treatment (BTT) strategy for high blood pressure is more effective and cost-effective than treat-to-target (TTT) or hybrid approaches in China and India. BTT significantly reduces cardiovascular disease mortality and improves health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Health Economics
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) targets a 25% reduction in chronic disease mortality by 2025.
- High blood pressure (hypertension) is a primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- Comparing blood pressure management strategies is crucial for public health initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three blood pressure management strategies in China and India.
- To evaluate a benefit-based tailored treatment (BTT) strategy against treat-to-target (TTT) and WHO hybrid strategies.
- To inform policy decisions for CVD risk reduction.
Main Methods:
- Development of a microsimulation model for adults aged 30-70 in China and India.
- Comparison of BTT (≥10% 10-year CVD risk) with TTT and WHO hybrid strategies over a 10-year horizon.
- Analysis of cost-effectiveness in terms of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted.
Main Results:
- The BTT strategy averted approximately 5 million more DALYs in China and India compared to the TTT approach.
- BTT demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness, with costs ranging from $205 to $272 per DALY averted.
- The hybrid strategy offered no substantial benefits over the TTT approach.
- BTT's effectiveness remained robust across various sensitivity analyses, including risk estimation, age ranges, and treatment adherence.
Conclusions:
- A simplified benefit-based tailored treatment (BTT) strategy is more effective and cost-effective for reducing mortality.
- BTT offers a significant advantage over traditional treat-to-target and WHO hybrid strategies.
- These findings support the adoption of BTT for hypertension management to improve population health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
