Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

472
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
472
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

313
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
313
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.9K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
Dark Triad and Person Perception01:29

Dark Triad and Person Perception

418
Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et...
418
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

96.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
96.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interfacial Reverse Charge Transfer Enabling Near 100% Selectivity of Glycerol Photooxidation into Formate over Schottky's Au/TiO<sub>2</sub>.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

A Novel Framework for Gene Regulatory Network Inference Integrating Bidirectional Mamba and Dual Contrastive Learning.

ACS synthetic biology·2026
Same author

Creating High Plasticity in Hard Ceramics via Coherent Twin Boundary Migration-Driven Detwinning.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

AS-IV attenuates nigral NLRP3 inflammasome in a Parkinson's disease mouse model via gut microbiota.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

The ED<sub>90</sub> of Oliceridine for Tracheal Intubation in Children: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Parallel Dose-Finding Study.

Drug design, development and therapy·2026
Same author

Constructing a Zincophilic CNT@POF Coating on a Zn Anode for Dendrite-Free Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.3K

Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.

Jing Chai1,2, Weina Qu1, Xianghong Sun1

  • 1Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, CAS, Beijing, China.

Plos One
|January 15, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dangerous drivers show heightened negativity bias, processing negative emotional information more strongly than safe drivers. This bias is linked to increased crashes and reduced inhibitory control, impacting driving behavior.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

16.0K
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.3K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

16.0K
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Traffic Safety Research
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dangerous driving is linked to distinct behavioral and cognitive traits.
  • Emotional information processing differences in drivers remain under-explored.
  • Prior research connects anger/anxiety traits to crash involvement and negativity bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate emotional information processing differences between dangerous and safe drivers.
  • To explore the relationship between negativity bias and driving behavior/crash history.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an emotional Stroop task to assess negativity biases.
  • Recruited 38 non-professional drivers, categorized into dangerous (≥6 penalty points) and safe (≤3 penalty points) groups.
  • Collected behavioral data and electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, including event-related potentials (ERPs).

Main Results:

  • Dangerous drivers exhibited significantly stronger negativity biases compared to safe drivers.
  • Negativity bias scores correlated with self-reported dangerous driving behaviors and a higher incidence of past crashes.
  • EEG data showed reduced P3 components in dangerous drivers for negative stimuli, indicating impaired inhibitory control over emotionally salient, task-irrelevant information.

Conclusions:

  • Negativity bias is a key differentiator between dangerous and safe drivers.
  • Enhanced negativity bias may contribute to dangerous driving and increased crash risk.
  • Impaired inhibitory control over emotional stimuli could be a neurocognitive factor in dangerous driving.